Our organization has decided to err on the side of …

Comment on Dr. Aseem Malhotra: From Pro-Vax to Anti-Vax by John Fleming.

Our organization has decided to err on the side of caution regarding the process of injection. The U.S. has had over 620 million injections and the world nearly 13 billion. A rare negative occurrence based on these numbers has an impact even if it is a very small risk. 1/100th of 1 percent having a negative reaction in the U.S. would equate to a problem for over 6,000.

John Fleming Also Commented

Dr. Aseem Malhotra: From Pro-Vax to Anti-Vax
At one time aspiration was a standard practice to determine if a needle’s contents were being injected into a vein sending it directly to the heart. That recommendation was withdrawn by the CDC about 10 years ago. More data is needed, I wonder if this could contribute to negative reactions to COVID vaccine injections?

Recent Comments by John Fleming

Natural vs. Vaccine-derived Immunity
The most recent arguments I’m seeing list places like the UK National Statistics where the death rate appears higher for the vaccinated vs. the unvaccinated. Would you have current study links to the efficacy of COVID vaccinations in the U.S. or elsewhere?

Pastor Doug Hardt: Vaccines, Liberty and the Bible
A recent voice against vaccinations is Dr. Conrad Vine in this presentation at the Village Church. Any additional thoughts regarding his recommendations to Adventists, https://youtu.be/3YLTjXhhk_c?

Dr. Peter McCullough’s COVID-19 and Anti-Vaccine Theories
Rumors persist about the COVID vaccines containing secret or proprietary ingredients graphene oxide and fetal cells. What would be your response that the ingredient lists being published are transparent and factual?

Dr. Peter McCullough’s COVID-19 and Anti-Vaccine Theories
Rumors are rampant, including this video, https://youtu.be/avH5vEgibW0, that the mRNA may trigger an issue with CRSPR, a process that interferes or destroys DNA processes. What would be your response?

Dr. Peter McCullough’s COVID-19 and Anti-Vaccine Theories
Another Doctor is presenting the following on Ivermectin, I believe you have studies showing it is not currently effective in reducing COVID infection rates?

Ivermectin works in 6 different ways (mechanisms of action). This is why it is broadly used to treat a variety of conditions in humans and animals. Ivermectin has been used in humans for many decades and is considered one of the safest drugs. The conditions ivermectin used for include: round worm infections, scabies, skin conditions such as rosacea, lupus, etc. Ivermectin trials for corona virus in Bangladesh and China found when combined with zinc and doxycycline has a 100% cure rate for corona viruses. It costs about $2/day to use.
Here are the 6 mechanisms of action (there may be more):
1. ) IVERMECTIN prevents viral entry into host cells. Viruses in general do not have its own machinery to replicate. It makes use of the host cells’ ribosomal complex in order to transcribe and translate its genomic material. And this can only be achieved if the virus gains entry into the host cells.
2) IVERMECTIN prevents viral entry into the nucleus of the cells.
3) IVERMECTIN inhibits genomic transcription and translation.
4) IVERMECTIN prevents cytokine storm.
5) IVERMECTIN prevents CD-147 vascular occlusion and reaching a state of hypercoagulation.
6) IVERMECTIN increases interferon production and enhances its effects. One very important mechanism of immune response against viruses is the production of interferon. Interferon are like the bullets fired directly against the viruses by the immune cells. IVERMECTIN was found to specifically stimulate interferon production and enhancement.