Good point. What is Babylon? It is a …

Comment on Are LSU professors breaking the 8th commandment? by John Hasse.

Good point. What is Babylon? It is a mixture of truth and error. How much error is needed in an assembly (‘church’) to qualify? Mrs White used ‘Babylonian language’ (“Through union with the world the church will become corrupt,–‘a cage of every unclean and hateful bird.'” –R/H feb 26 1895) and applied it to ‘the church’. On Oct 31 1899 she said “the first, second and third angels’ messages are to be repeated. The call is to be given to the church: ‘Babylon the great is fallen, and is become the habitation of devils, and the hold of every foul spirit, and cage of every unclean and hateful bird…” On Aug 1 1803 She said “And thou, Capernaum [Seventh-day Adventists, who have had great light,] which are exalted unto heaven [in point of privilege] shalt be brought down to hell” And how does Scripture tell us to relate to ‘Babylon’? See Rev 18:4. (It does not recommend petitioning it to change) In obedience to the Savior YAHUSHUA I have left the SDA structure, so I suppose you will consider my comments not ‘qualified’ I will not fail to share the truth of Scripture with you.

Recent Comments by John Hasse

Panda’s Thumb: ‘SDAs are split over evolution’
SDA’s are also comfortable with suing each other, in spite of I Cor 6. comfortable calling the Almighty by heathen names, in spite of Ex 23:13. Unclear about which special days YHVH set apart, in spite of Lev 23. Why are we surprised that they do not agree with the Genesis account???


Defining Adventism: A poll
If you are following scripture, can you affirm trinitarianism, which contradicts scripture? Can you call the Almighty by heathen names, in violation of Ex 23:13? Can you ignore the special days He set apart (Lev 23) and follow the days the Catholic church set aside????


Open letter to General Conference
Rev 18:4 does not tell us to reform ‘the church’ or even to pray for it…. but to ‘come out of it’. No doubt you don’t really care what YAHUSHUA, or a follower of His says, but rather are only interested in members of ‘the structure’. So be it.