Comment on Board requests progress reports from LSU administration by Geanna Dane.
Shane, I like the floating logs idea but we have to go back to this:
Gen 7:21 And all flesh died that moved upon the earth, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of beast, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth, and every man:
Gen 7:22 All in whose nostrils was the breath of life, of all that was in the dry land, died.
Gen 7:23 And every living substance was destroyed which was upon the face of the ground…
So if we are going to be consistent and take every word here literally, then EVERYTHING today descended from the animals that came off the ark on Mt. Ararat. We have not tother choice. We’ve barely touched on the problems this poses for just 4000 years.
As I’ve mentioned none of us can explain how rattlesnakes found the time to crawl all the way to the distant pionts of the New world and evolve into 30 species. None of us can answer how sidewinder rattlesnakes and horned vipers got from the ark to deserts on two different continents and despite having differnet ancestors they evolved to look identical (apart from the rattle and facial pits on the sidewinder).
None of us can explain how 400 species of plethodontid salamanders and 100 species of leptodactylid frogs ended up in the New Worl with none in the Old World. As amphibians they could not have survived salt water or swam across the ocean. Most or all had to have evolved in the New World from ancestrs that left the ark.
Okay, those animals have difficulty hopping and crawling but sure if you can fly you can get off one continent and on to antoher. Yet none of us us can answer how how 300 species of trochilids (hummingbirds), 500 species of tyranids (flycatchers), and 300 species of funariids (ovenbirds, woodcreepers) all flew to or evolved in the New World without any remaining in the Old World.
We have’nt gotten into mammals (Australia has big issues) or fishes. How did all those freshwater fishes end up on the ark and then end up back in the New World? I dont have time right now to look up how many species might have evolved in the New World.
And then there are island species. Amphibians- how many species occur only in the Caribeean islands and no where else? How could they get there? Okay- found that, unbeleivable numbers! 6,550 species of plants found no where else, 41 mammals, 163 birds, 469 reptiles, 170 amphibians, 65 freshwater fishes. Whew! How did the freshwater amphibians and fishes get there from the ark? If they did’nt they sure evolved incredibly fast! How did the plants get there without also traveling (seeds in wind, on water?) without traveling somewhere else?
These are questions we biology majors in college have to deal with. The evolutionists have it easy: they say all this evolved over many millions of years. We have it tough: we have to say this evolved over a wee 4,000 years. Obviouisly we need a creationsit model that can answer these questions if we are going to believe that the majority of evidence favors creation like so many say.
Geanna Dane Also Commented
Board requests progress reports from LSU administration
David, I think the one showing most humility would say “I trust that God is telling me some of the truth about our origins, even if I don’t currently understand the means and mechanisms by which the created kinds spread out and diversified into so many different species. I have enough confidence in science and its conclusions to know that the Bible perhaps cannot be taken literally as it reads all of the time; the way many Adventists have read the Bible could be wrong in some regards. Many Adventists have been open to the possibilty of new light and so am I.â€
I know this is’nt what you wanted to hear but its my personal conviction that some level of open mindednes (more so than you gave in your examples) is a necesary part of humility.
Board requests progress reports from LSU administration
I think Bravus is limiting his conclusions to what we can learn about God through science. I dont think he is including what God revealed to us in the Bible, which is not a scientific document. His main point was that we need more humility and I think God makes this clear him/herself. You know, no matter what he writes some of you guys are awfuly quick to jump all over him..
Board requests progress reports from LSU administration
Bravus, I totally agree with you!
Recent Comments by Geanna Dane
Ravi Zacharias: Should Church Members be Held to a Higher Standard?
Professor Kent, thank you for defending me, but its not really necessary. You have been very kind to me and I have greatly appreciated the way you and your wife so generously share your faith. You have given me added confidence in the Bible and I have a better understanding of how to trust God’s word ahead of science. Thanks to your encouragement I now enjoy attending church more than ever. I have also learned that my personal experience with God is much stronger when I avoid contentious and negative websites like this one. After reading a few posts here I can’t bear the thought of reading more. Makes my stomach turn.
Your friend,
Geanna
Ravi Zacharias: Should Church Members be Held to a Higher Standard?
Wow, a friend gave me a phone call and sure enough, my name has come up here again.
Ken, please understand that you are seeing some of the worst of Adventism at this website. I don’t understand the mean-spirited and snarkey posts that are so common here even from clergy like Pastor Constantinescu. I can forgive their treatment of me and others as I attribute their comments to the impersonal nature of the internet. I strongly suspect that if I were casually chatting with them in the foyer after church they would be very kind and gracious, much like most other church members that I sit down with in the pews each week. I prefer to assume these men are sincere upstanding Christians and so I don’t wish to respond in kind to their remarks.
I actually have family in Michigan and fully intend to sit in on a service by Pastor Constantinescu one day. I will make a point to visit with him personally after the service and he will not know who I am (unless I decide to publicy post my impression afterwards- which I think would be uncharitable of me). He will answer to God how he has treated me and others here, and how he treats people in person. I don’t care to defend myself further. Believe whatever you wish to believe, Ken, but know that Jesus loved his enemies and we should be willing to do the same.
Video show LSU undermining church doctrine
I don’t think there is anything any of you truly wish to hear from me. It doesn’t matter how nice or agreeable I am, everything gets interpreted from an extreme point of view that I am seldom able to anticipate. If I have misplaced anything, it has been my time spent here. I agree on many issues about the message, but I don’t share the personal vendetta and punitive approach that others articulate here.
I wrote a very nice, very sincere reply to Sean, thanking him for the many positive things he does for the church. There was no anger or sarcasm in the message. I don’t know why it has not been approved for posting yet, but he is welcome to treat and interpret the message as he wishes. I’ve made my peace and I am finished for good.
Good-bye
Video show LSU undermining church doctrine
Sean,
Thank you for your concerns about the education of Adventist young people and for trying to find solutions to save them from losing their faith. We need them and they need us.
Thank you for attempting to share with Adventists your understanding of the overwhelming evidence that supports our belief in God, the Bible, Genesis, 6 days, 6,000 years, the spirit of prophecy, the nonexistance of the flying spaghetti monster, and the like. It’s refreshing to know that faith is not enough.
Thank you for bringing the importance of “transparency” and “on the church’s dime” to our attention. Your concepts are like manna to the faithful.
Thank you for pointing out individuals and institutions by name, and making clear to us how they continue to undermine the fundamental values and beliefs of our church and how our administrators have utterly failed to correct them. They must surely be a part of the much-anticipated omega apostasy.
Thank you for taking so much time to correct those of us who disagree with you. Perhaps there is hope for us after all.
Thank you for adhering so vigorously to what you believe to be God’s will for your life. We admire your fidelity to your stated positions and family and spiritual values.
Thank you for defending the faith of those who do not understand or agree with your views but still believe in many of the same spiritual truths that you do. We can only hope that they too can find their way to the kingdom of God.
Thank you for being so patient and respectful toward those who hold to different views than you do. Your example will perhaps inspire these individuals in ways that only God can understand.
May God bless you abundantly.
Video show LSU undermining church doctrine
So, no big deal right? Since most are not affected nothing needs to be done for those that are?
I didn’t say either, Sean. I respectfully pointed out that it was unnecessarily cruel, in my humble opinion, to shut down a university (as some have argued), ship it to Europe (as one individual suggested), or tell parents to send their children elsewhere when so many students have no exposure to the lies and theft that you have diligently brought to our attention and receive blessings from an Adventist college that are very difficult to get from a secular college.
Why is it that I can’t say even one acceptable thing here? No one should object to anything I’ve written in the past few posts above this one. Can’t you simply say, “Thank you Geanna for sharing your experiences and views. You raise some valid points.”
