Comment on How much of the Human Genome is Functional? by Dana.
with no broken bones
-to determine that something is a beneficial mutation one has to demostrate that that gene didn´t exist before (generations back) in the members of that family and must specify when it appeared.
better survival in cold weather environments
-same as above, if one can study the geneaology of that people to show that it is about gaining and not about losing of that specific gene in the other populations.
vaccination
-introduction of the microbe into the blood through rupture in the continuity of the skin by a needle, by-passing the natural defense of an organism (located at every natural orifice and skin) is a violation of the laws of immune system (read Matzinger and also J. Oller). Bacteria form our first barrier defense. Bacteria-bacteria interaction is the main principle in nature.
“It’s called immunity”.
-No, it is called immunization. They are not interchangeable. Long explanation.
cholesterol
-the age of the great myth on cholesterol will end soon. Cholesterol on the arteries is a protective mechanism against inflammation. Artherogenesis is a side effect. Statins, agents used to lower the cholesterol are potent antiinflammatory agents… with their side effects.
Dana. M.D. and Specialist in Clinical Immunology
Europe.
Happy Sabbath!
Table of Contents
Dana Also Commented
How much of the Human Genome is Functional?
:)) It took you long enough… the issue of prions!:)
so,
Prions are self-replicating proteins (act as template).
Prokaryotes as bacteria are self-reproducing organism (split themselves).
Eukaryotes procreate, they need a mate.
Which evolutionary laws apply to each of them?
If eukaryotes evolved from prokaryotes, why we still have prokaryotes?
If mamals evolved from fish, why still have fish?
How you explain the “tree of evolution” in the light of darwinian transmutation?
I´m asking because, to be honest with you, I have any clue..!
Thanks in advance!
How much of the Human Genome is Functional?
“self-replicating systems” means prions?:))
How much of the Human Genome is Functional?
¡Qué fuerte! Tú sí que sabes!:)) So, are u telling me that the “natural selection” by itself has the ability to clean up deleterious mutations?:))
Yes, in an already formed organism is understood that the repairing mechanisms are engraved in their genes and, when that mechanisms are surpassed, the disease appears. Also, the plasticity of different cells and tissues is strictly conditioned by their genome (see the regulatory T cells vs the rest of T helper´s family). Giving specific conditions, inactive genes can turn “on” and other (active ones) will turn “off” in order to maintain the homeostasis of an organism. But, in an unevolved (not undeveloped) organism where the genes are not formed yet, how the “natural selection” works? How the “natural selection” knows to select the right genes from that “primordial chaos” and for which purpose to build it if there is nothing to expect? How it knows to assemble them in order to build a coherent organism? How the “natural selection” chooses between a deleterious gene and a beneficial one? Is “natural selection” analyzing its results and says: yes, it makes sense!? Is the “natural selection” endowed with an intrinsic “consciousness”? Is the “natural selection” God?? (or God Nature?)
My problem with God is a sentimental one:)).
ps. with all my appreciation for your time and yr energy! Hope you are expecting nothing from all this, right?
cheers.
