Sean I hope you live through your vaccination. I have …

Comment on Are mRNA Vaccines for COVID-19 helpful or harmful? by Stephen Billiter.

Sean I hope you live through your vaccination. I have new info on the mRNA vaccines, and BTW, I never look at conspiracy theorists false ideas–but I do think you’re posts are loaded with untruths and propaganda–there are many doctors involved with false science–you’re not the first nor the last.

Prof. Dolores Cahill of Ireland (Immunologist) believes that in a few months people will start dying of cytokine storms from the mRNA vaccines. This video is just over 10 minutes long–please debunk this info…if you can. Following also is a paper abstract from PubMed–you’re also welcome to try and debunk this one too. I may be a retired carpenter, but I do know when I’m being lied to.

Aims of the study: Patient comprehension is a critical part of meeting medical ethics standards of informed consent in study designs. The aim of the study was to determine if sufficient literature exists to require clinicians to disclose the specific risk that COVID-19 vaccines could worsen disease upon exposure to challenge or circulating virus.

Methods used to conduct the study: Published literature was reviewed to identify preclinical and clinical evidence that COVID-19 vaccines could worsen disease upon exposure to challenge or circulating virus. Clinical trial protocols for COVID-19 vaccines were reviewed to determine if risks were properly disclosed.

Results of the study: COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated. Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralising antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials.

Conclusions drawn from the study and clinical implications: The specific and significant COVID-19 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent.

So if you’re disease free, you may live longer–but don’t forget about the cancer cells too–hopefully, you won’t get cancer from this. Everything that I said about the ingredients is true–prove it is not. In fact, I will find a package insert and copy the info right here and expose what you said.

The CDC has stated those first few severe reactions of anaphylactic shock that it’s probably caused by the polyethelene glycol which you just said was not in these vaccines.

I will pray that the Lord will preserve your life from the vaccine (s) and maybe better things will happen with you.

Stephen Billiter Also Commented

Are mRNA Vaccines for COVID-19 helpful or harmful?
Hey Sean,

As promised, I took a look at Sangers Sequencing and I found a 43 page PDF from the FDA who is complicit in the scam–it’s simply the entirety of the PCR test they all are using. However, I did learn a little something here:

“The qSanger-COVID-19 Assay is a Sanger sequencing-based, RNA extraction-free diagnostic test intended for the qualitative detection of nucleic acid from SARS-CoV-2 in upper respiratory swab specimens (such as nasal swab, mid-turbinate swab, nasopharyngeal swab, and oropharyngeal swab specimens) from individuals suspected of COVID-19 by their healthcare provider. Testing is limited to laboratories that are certified under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA), 42 U.S.C. §263a, and meet requirements to perform high complexity tests.”

And it’s this: “Testing is limited to laboratories that are certified under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA), 42 U.S.C. §263a, and meet requirements to perform high complexity tests.”

So only certain labs can give us the false/positives that make up all the fraudulent cases and deaths in the US–I’m sure other countries have their versions of these labs too. It would be a no-brainer to also insure that these labs are also complicit if need be–Gates and the other billionaires-3-6 hundred billions of dollars of money is more than enough. I simply do not need to break down all the science involved here, and separate it the false from the true to see the hoax.

Why would I need to study science for years to be able to break down all of these 43 pages of information, and critically analyze it? Once again:

John_16:13 However, when he, the Spirit of truth, is come, he will guide you into all truth: for he shall not speak of himself; but whatever he shall hear, that shall he speak: and he will show you things to come.

Some doctors and scientists are honest and trustworthy, and some are not.

Are mRNA Vaccines for COVID-19 helpful or harmful?
Sean, you said,

“First off, the website “” is filled with conspiracy theory videos. It simply isn’t a reliable place to get your information.”

Wow, I got this from you on this first day that I looked at your information on Dr. Wakefield–I had never heard of BrandNewTube until I saw this video. Watch out what you link to–now according to you, I’m into “conspiracy theories” because I got BrandNewTube from you.

Sure, there’s some conspiracy theories there, and some true science–you made an all-inclusive statement that’s incorrect.

1Th 5:21 “Prove all things; hold fast that which is good.”

Everything needs to be judged on it’s own merits

Besides, youtube is highly censored even with Scott Ritsema’s (SDA) CovidDystopia–the true science presented there is banned from YouTube. You just don’t get it.

Then you proceed to shoot down the PCR inventor’s own testimony about his own test because he was into astrology. So what. Has Satan ever had any part into you? or me? Absolutely–and you dare to speak nonsense and garbage about someone who is dead and cannot defend themselves? Wow, Sean, how far will you go to defend your false science?

You cite studies by doctors all the time, plus the two new ones in the video-what kind of dirt could I or anyone else dig up on them? Plenty. I don’t need to stoop to character assassination to try and prove my points but apparently you, the trained doctor, does.

Are mRNA Vaccines for COVID-19 helpful or harmful?
Sean, as you know, I believe differently than you on the “best empirical evidence.” I prefer to listen and take heed to scientists and doctors who are not comprised by this highly corrupt medical system which includes Big Pharma and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation–Dr. Fauci sits on that board.

I ask myself, is it reasonable? Can I analyze it properly? What real evidence is there? And last but not least–what does the Holy Spirit reveal to me?

John_16:13 However, when He, the Spirit of truth, is come, He will guide you into all truth: for He shall not speak of himself; but whatever He shall hear, that shall He speak: and He will show you things to come (AKJV).

This tells me that “all truth” means exactly that, and not just Bible truth, or religious truth. This is why I know positively that this pandemic is a hoax–based upon the PCR test that cannot detect any virus–I’ve seen and heard the real science, and the motives behind it–Satan is at the root of it all. Of course he’s the author of real pandemics and epidemics too.

Same with all vaccines, what a scam that is! Far too many injuries and deaths have been reported in the VAERS system over the years, and that my friend, is not any conspiracy theory. Even the Federal Vaccine Court is a joke–some cases like mine never even make it there–dropped by attorneys for money reasons–not a smoking gun or serious enough for them to make the fees they want.

I look at the bright side–my injury while about 60 % healed now with a significant pain reduction, caused me to look at the real evidence behind vaccines and how harmful they are–none of them are needed for anything. If we follow God’s health laws most of us will be fairly healthy. Lots of studies suggest or show how harmful vaccines are.

The info below is backed by scientific studies–a day old baby is assaulted by a Hep B vaccine when it’s just coming alive and drawing it’s first breaths–many are vaccinated a short time later and die suddenly in their cribs, or beds–SIDS deaths. The vaccine industry makes money and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation’s depopulation plan claims another innocent victim–not conspiracy theory.
SIDS deaths.

Scientific studies about the different vaccine injuries and deaths

As for Dr. Wakefield the courageous CDC whistleblower–has my thanks for what he did–we need more doctors like him that denies the moneyed, evil influences of Big Pharma putting his own career in jeopardy because he really cares about others.

As for the 2 doctors you just linked to on youtube that promote the pandemic lies–I can find and link to just as many doctors who know and reveal the truth of this hoax.

The British doctor recommended 20,000 IU’s daily of vitamin D3–a bit high, I would say–I use 3— 5 thousand daily as recommended by Walt Cross, SDA Medical Missionary in Tennessee. It appears that too high a dose daily will negatively increase calcium in the body.

He also said, “I’m happy with the vaccines.” Right, I hope they live through the vaccines that are useless and not needed. Too much propaganda for me–I prefer real doctors and not clones of the corrupted medical system.

Recent Comments by Stephen Billiter

Two Conflicting Arguments in Defense of La Sierra University
This article appears to be the most untrue, rabid attack that I’ve ever seen on God’s Word, which is too plain to be miscontrued.

Thank God for men like Sean Pittman and his staff that stands for truth despite the persecutions from evolutionists and their supporters.

I am still of the opinion that any church member that does not accept all 28 of our doctrines should by all means find themselves another church. But we know that Satan’s way is to attack truth from within.

We must be very close to the end of this age as we know it! “Come Lord Jesus, come.”

Changing the Wording of Adventist Fundamental Belief #6 on Creation
It saddens me to no end to see leadership in the Adventist Church who place their own opinions above the plain, unambiguous statements in God’s Word. Anyone who does not believe any of the 28 Fundamentals should be removed from membership immediately and not allowed to work at any Adventist Institution. They are of course welcome to attend church unless they still insist upon openly teaching lies.

Jesus spoke of two classes of church members in the parable of the wheat and tares in Matthew 13–tares being the plants of Satan, “but the tares are the children of the wicked one,”(Matt.13:38)and the good seed, the children of the kingdom.

Tares are simply professing church members who are unconverted and in various ways act as agents of Satan within the church to destroy God’s Word driving many away from Christ and salvation. They are themselves deceived.

It will worsen until the Sunday law comes–then all of them will accept the mark of the beast.

“Satan will work his miracles to deceive; he will set up his power as supreme. The church may appear as about to fall, but it does not fall. It remains, while the sinners in Zion will be sifted out–the chaff separated from the precious wheat. This is a terrible ordeal, but nevertheless it must take place. None but those who have been overcoming by the blood of the Lamb and the word of their testimony will be found with the loyal and true, without spot or stain of sin, without guile in their mouths. . . . The remnant that purify their souls by obeying the truth gather strength from the trying process, exhibiting the beauty of holiness amid the surrounding apostasy” (Letter 55, 1886). {7BC 911.6.

Revisiting God, Sky & Land by Fritz Guy and Brian Bull

Sean Pitman:

I personally think it important to read and address such challenges to fundamental Adventist positions coming from within the church itself – especially when coming from those who are or seem to be in a position of significant authority and responsibility within the church.Otherwise, many who do read these challenges, and find no rational counter arguments, will no doubt be convinced that the historic position of the Adventist Church on origins and other fundamental issues has been effectively falsified and that the Church itself has given up on many of its original foundational principles.

Sean Pitman

True, but just how many rabbits do we have time to chase?

Revisiting God, Sky & Land by Fritz Guy and Brian Bull
Genesis 1 and 2 plainly says the earth and all that’s in [it] was created in 6 literal days–adding up genealogies in Scripture also reveal the earth is about 6000 years old.

The place for the above mentioned book is the trash can. Perhaps these so-called learned doctors may also want to find another church more in line with their beliefs-or shall we say lack of beliefs? [edit]

Gen 1:5 And God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And the evening and the morning were the first day.

We have 6 evenings and mornings here for creation not counting the 7th Day Sabbath. How can anyone possibly read anything else into this? So these two men are above and know more than God does? How very, very sad indeed.

Two Adventist Universities Promote Six-Day Creation
@PUC Student

Where is your corroborating evidence to assist your assertions, PUC Student?