Comment on La Sierra “outraged” over Educate Truth article by Bravus.
It wasn’t me who rated the post – I haven’t been rating any – but you did select one slide from a whole course and use it to make claims about the whole course…
Table of Contents
Bravus Also Commented
La Sierra “outraged” over Educate Truth article
The good old square-cube law will get ya every time… but I’m sure there’s a response being written even now about the superior just-created nature of antediluvian muscles…
La Sierra “outraged” over Educate Truth article
Interesting question: why have there never been any 12 foot human skeletons or fossil remains found?
(honestly just interested, not making an aggressive point or trying to win an argument)
La Sierra “outraged” over Educate Truth article
Nup… she testified to her own experience: others extrapolated that too broadly and attacked for not reflecting their own perception of the totality of the university. If anyone made that mistake, it wasn’t Ramona.
Recent Comments by Bravus
Ted Wilson: “We will not flinch. We will not be deterred.”
Interesting that he says he is very proud of the GRI when they clearly said during the discussion that there is ‘no model’ of scientifically credible recent creationism that can be taught in our universities.
“Don’t go backwards to interpret Genesis as allegorical or symbolic”
My guess on the two-thirds thing is that what is actually being said is ‘more than two-thirds’. 99% is more than two-thirds… that specific number was chosen, not as the actual vote-count, but as a break-point: some motions need a simple majority, some need a two-thirds majority… and the vote well and truly delivered that, and more.
Just my interpretation.
GC Votes to Revise SDA Fundamental #6 on Creation
Excellent, excellent post above. J. Knight.
“Don’t go backwards to interpret Genesis as allegorical or symbolic”
(that should be ‘place in the church’)
“Don’t go backwards to interpret Genesis as allegorical or symbolic”
Bobbie Vedvick, the quote you asked about was a parody, penned by me.
Faith (and many others in this thread), the comments about those who will be driven out of SDAism by this push tend to assume that they are in disagreement with what has always been SDA belief. This is not the case: the very strong literalist recent creationist position is a relatively recent view. Note that what has happened at this GC is a vote for a *change* to Fundamental Belief 6. SDA beliefs are being *changed*, and those who won’t go along for the ride told they have no ce in the church.
