Woe are we. I attended LSU. I saw liberality allowing …

Comment on Student reveals true intent of LSU’s biology seminar class by Sis.

Woe are we. I attended LSU. I saw liberality allowing the [homosexual] club and now evolution. I just attended Wed prayer meeting with Elder John Brunt explaining how the church let him go at Glacier View with Desmond Ford (30yrs ago) and his anti SDA beliefs that he was teaching at PUC. Why can’t we do the same today with the LSU professors? Why do we too become liberal?

Recent Comments by Sis

LSU student petition surfaces
Thank you Shane for letting us know and then keeping us informed. If only this petition could have been responded to and acted on. If we as SDA’s had had your kind of informative information for many of the creeping compromises our schools and churches and conferences have slid into over the years. Yes I want to say please keep up the good work. Thank u again. May God bless you mightely. Sis

LSU board members do have whistleblower protection
At Sunset Lake, Family Camp in Washington State, summer of 2009, sitting overlooking the lake during worship, the director’s son acted out the following.
Please Dad, I really want to go.
Well I’ve heard the language spoken there at those parties is bad.
Just a little bit Dad. Just a little bit. Please Dad, can’t I go? All my friends are going. Well I’ve heard, they watch movies that are not good.
Just a little bit Dad. Just a little bit. I really want to go please Dad please.
Well I’ve heard they do things with girls they shouldn’t do.
Just a little bit Dad.Just a little bit. Please Dad please!!!
Well I guess you can go but first I want you to eat and then give me your opinion on some brownies I made.
I can go, really, I can go Dad!!!!!! Yes, of course I’ll gladly eat a brownie. You made
this Dad ??
Do you like it?
It’s okey. How did you make it?
Oh, it wasn’t hard. I just followed the recipe and then I just added some dog poo.
DOG POO!! BLAAAA spit spit BLAAAA spit DAD!!!.
It’s just a little bit, just a little bit. I didn’t put in much dog poo.
DAD why would you ruin good brownies?
Ruin them why all the rest of the brownies are good, good flour, good sugar, good seasonings, yummee chocolate and even good expensive nuts. I only put in a little bit of dog poo.
Dad you know even a little bit of bad ruins the whole thing.
BUT, It’s just a little bit I just put in a little bit, just a very little bit, I promise.
Dad if you didn’t want me to go you could have just told me.

The article written for the PACIFIC UNION RECORDER by the president of the Pacific Union Conference and chairman of the LSU board says nothing. Yes, I said NOTHING, nothing that we didn’t already know.
We knew LSU professors are teaching evolution.
We know a biology student is being austrasized – blamed for saying anything. Yet the president claims in his article that “LSU will be a school where every student –regardless of their beliefs about origins–will be respected.” I guess as long as you don’t point out beliefs that a professor is teaching.
He took a whole paragraph to tell us how much time he has spent on this LSU dilemma. But not one word about what he is concretely going to do to correct it. No meeting scheduled to meet with the professors. No statement as to what they will discuss with the professors (as we as a church did with Desmond Ford). No conclusion to anything. All very wordy but ambiguous. .
As he said, in the early 1900’s, Ellen G. White and others organized the church into conferences and districts as well as individual churches with committees and boards to prevent the SDA’s from “kingly, ruling power”. So now we want to look at more she says besides this.
Ellen G. White also says, as our PUC president quoted from the book Education p17 “It is the work of true education to …train the youth to be thinkers and not mere reflectors of other men’s thought” Why then are you not commending the young man that didn’t just sit there in class listening to falsehood but instead thought for himself. Thus bringing to yours and our attention the non-Adventist falsehood that was being taught??
You might say I’m being judgmental to refer to his ‘listening to falsehood’. Then you as well as our president need to answer why evolution or any belief other than the Biblical literal 6 day creation belief is not falsehood when we read from the same book he referred to ‘Education’ only on pages 128 and 129 in the chapter SCIENCE AND THE BIBLE written by the author our president quoted Ellen G. White. I quote,”
Geology has been thought to contradict the literal interpretation of the Mosaic record of the creation. Millions of years, it is claimed, were required for the evolution of the earth from chaos; and in order to accommodate the Bible to this supposed revelation of science, the days of creation are assumed to have been vast, indefinite periods, covering thousands or even millions of years.
{Ed 128.2}
Such a conclusion is wholly uncalled for. The Bible record is in harmony with itself and with the teaching of nature. Of the first day employed in the work of creation is given the record, “The evening and the morning were the first day.” Genesis 1:5. And the same in substance is said of each of the first six days of creation week. Each of these periods Inspiration declares to have been a day consisting of evening and morning, like every other day since that time. In regard to the work of creation itself the divine testimony is, “He spake, and it was done; He commanded, and it stood fast.” Psalm 33:9. With Him who could thus call into existence unnumbered worlds, how long a time would be required for the evolution of the earth from chaos? In order to account for His works, must we do violence to His word? {Ed 129.1}
It is true that remains found in the earth testify to the existence of men, animals, and plants much larger than any now known. These are regarded as proving the existence of vegetable and animal life prior to the time of the Mosaic record. But concerning these things Bible history furnishes ample explanation. Before the Flood the development of vegetable and animal life was immeasurably superior to that which has since been known. At the Flood the surface of the earth was broken up, marked changes took place, and in the re-formation of the earth’s crust were preserved many evidences of the life previously existing. The vast forests buried in the earth at the time of the Flood, and since changed to coal, form the extensive coal fields, and yield the supplies of oil that minister to our comfort and convenience today. These things, as they are brought to light, are so many witnesses mutely testifying to the truth of the word of God.
{Ed 129.2}
Akin to the theory concerning the evolution of the earth is that which attributes to an ascending line of germs, mollusks, and quadrupeds the evolution of man, the crowning glory of the creation. {Ed 130.1}
When consideration is given to man’s opportunities for research; how brief his life; how limited his sphere of action; how restricted his vision; how frequent and how great the errors in his conclusions, especially as concerns the events thought to antedate Bible history; how often the supposed deductions of science are revised or cast aside; with what readiness the assumed period of the earth’s development is from time to time increased or diminished by millions of years; and how the theories advanced by different scientists conflict with one another, –considering all this, shall we, for the privilege of tracing our descent from germs and mollusks and apes, consent to cast away that statement of Holy Writ, so grand in its simplicity, “God created man in His own image, in the image of God created He him”? Genesis 1:27. Shall we reject that genealogical record,–prouder than any treasured in the courts of kings,–“which was the son of Adam, which was the son of God”? Luke 3:38. {Ed 130.2}
Rightly understood, both the revelations of science and the experiences of life are in harmony with the testimony of Scripture to the constant working of God in nature. {Ed 130.3}
In the hymn recorded by Nehemiah, the Levites sang, “Thou, even Thou, art Lord alone; Thou hast made heaven, the heaven of heavens, with all their host, the earth, and all things that are therein, the seas, and all that is therein, and Thou preservest them all.” Nehemiah 9:6. {Ed 130.4}

I am a previous student in the Speech dept. and now a retired teacher and speech language pathologist. Having worked for districts, I know professors of college, as these men are, are under tenure. Which means they can’t just be let go or replaced, for no reason. You say it takes time. No! If they quit showing up for work without calling in you would talk to them, right then. If they continued this absenteeism you would (nicely put it) relieve them of their duties instantly. Or not so nicely put ‘fire them’. If they are not teaching SDA curriculum in an SDA institution, being paid by SDA tuition, then they can be instantly relieved of their jobs/ positions—let go, fired! How long do you think a Catholic University would tolerate an SDA doctrine being taught in their school?
Why do you think we are all so stupid as to not see through these professors and your apostasy. STOP what’s going on. NOW! Instantly. These professors are not Seventh Day Adventists. These professors are placing a little bit of ‘dog poo’ in the minds of our, expensively-paid-for-college-educated youth. You say,” the Board of Trustees is committed to a spirit of open inquiry and discussion in the university’s classrooms.” You know that inquiry or discussion by the students with the teacher, is not the same as what curriculum the teacher is teaching.
You make two assertions as to ‘where will we end?’ Your first one says “LSU will be a school where the biblical account of a recent six-day creation will be respected and supported’ What does that mean? Why don’t you say TAUGHT? Why, because you can’t say it will be. And you’re lieing because you are not respecting or supporting the biblical account of a recent six-day creation as the student pointed out.
Your second assertion that LSU will be a school where every student will be respected. As previously stated that is not true by your own admission that the student that informed you as to what the professor was teaching, which was not the biblical account of a recent six-day creation, HE was not allowed to enroll in the fall semester.
In another section of the magazine entitled ‘La Sierra University Board Statement of Support for the Adventist View of Creation’; paragraphs 1 through 8, I refer to your statement that LSU is mindful of the University’s responsibilities and commitments as a Seventh-day Adventist institution. And that this includes support for the doctrines and teachings of the SDA church as stated specifically in fundamental belief #6 concerning God and creation. Then you admit that the” SDA beliefs and teachings have NOT been given appropriate priority –Whatever that means. It’s either SDA or it is not. So if you are mindful of such (some dog poo added to the enrolled students curriculum), as you say, what are you going to do about it? I repeat, What are you going to do about it? If you do nothing than you are not a Seventh Day Adventist University as the Michigan Conference has stated. If you are going to do something about it then we want to see it happen NOW. NOW means just that, NOW, not tomorrow or the next day but ‘NOW!!!’
I want done the same action you would take if you caught one of your professors raping a student or better yet raping your daughter. Thank you for your fast action, instant action.