Bobbie, I would like to add a thought to my …

Comment on Ted Wilson: “We will not flinch. We will not be deterred.” by Jim McDonald.

Bobbie, I would like to add a thought to my above comment. There are Biologists who don’t have the presupposition of an all powerful God who in their study of science have come to the conclusion of intelligent design. They can’t except the evolutionary model. In fact, sometimes, it seems that those who study biology without “any” presuppositions seem to come to a knowledge of an higher being – our Creator God.

blessings,
Jim

Jim McDonald Also Commented

Ted Wilson: “We will not flinch. We will not be deterred.”
Bobbie,

Just a thought. If you don’t believe in a miracle working all powerful God, then evolution makes more sense. If you study science believing in an all powerful miracle working God, your faith will be strengthened by what you see. So, in short, if you study science believing in the God of the Bible as the Bible describes Him – your faith will likely be strengthened. If you are unsure in what you believe, evolution will provide “evidence” of origins.

I for one trust the authority of the Word of God and for me, science simply reaffirms my belief in a Creator God.

blessings,
Jim


Ted Wilson: “We will not flinch. We will not be deterred.”
thanks for sharing those thoughts Michael! I believe that it is important for use to see where the end of “progressive” theology lies. Taking something to the final conclusion often helps in seeing beginning error.

blessings,

Jim


Recent Comments by Jim McDonald

CCC Requests “Decisive and Conclusive Resolution” from LSU
Once again it is good to see that there are still men among God’s people willing to stand firm on God’s Word yet with the gentle kindness of Jesus. May God strengthen His laborers in this time of crisis!


Video show LSU undermining church doctrine
It is interesting that the very premise Fritz Guy uses to challenge our current “absolute knowledge” is not necessarily used to challenge science’s current “absolute knowledge”. In challenging others thoughts, we should apply the same principles to critiquing our own thoughts.

Also, it is interesting that statements of Ellen White are used to promote a thought process somewhat different from the general tone of her writings. Some scientists do the same thing with recent findings. There seems to be a refusal by some religionists and scientists to look at “findings” that don’t fit in with their pre-suppositions.

Transparency should always be the goal, not only in someone else’s beliefs, but also in our own.

“Beginning at Genesis, they give up that which they deem questionable, and their minds lead on, for Satan will lead to any length they may follow in their criticism, and they see something to doubt in the whole Scriptures. Their faculties of criticism become sharpened by exercise, and they can rest on nothing with a certainty. You try to reason with these men, but your time is lost. They will exercise their power of ridicule even upon the Bible. They even become mockers, and they would be astonished if you put it to them in that light.” 1 Selected Messages, p. 18

May the God of the Bible grant us strength to follow Him. The prophecies & histories of the Word have stood the test of time and infidel – we can trust It.