Too bad this text doesn’t apply. In a broader sense …

Comment on LSU propaganda by Roger Seheult.

Too bad this text doesn’t apply. In a broader sense the characterization of this as “propoganda” is the defamation that is troubling.  (Quote)

Ah, but it does. Doing good (sacrifice) is no substitute for obedience to the word.

Rev 14:6,7
“And I saw another angel fly in the midst of heaven, having the everlasting gospel to preach unto them that dwell on the earth, and to every nation, and kindred, and tongue, and people, Saying with a loud voice, Fear God, and give glory to him; for the hour of his judgment is come: and worship him that made heaven, and earth, and the sea, and the fountains of waters.”

Sorry but feeding the poor, building classrooms, helping the sick are all good things – but they don’t hold up in the face of lack of obedience.

Why don’t they do both?

Roger Seheult Also Commented

LSU propaganda
Lydian Belknap:

This is only my opinion and none of anyone on this site.

You said: “The thing that concerns me a great deal at this point is the idea that there is no scientific information to support “Intelligent Design.” At least that is the statement I’ve heard numerous times on this site”

If you want to learn more I think you would really be interested in this man and his videos if you have not already. I get no money for referring him to you. He got me interested in this topic and energized me to do so.

Watch his life story and his videos noted below:

LSU propaganda
I agree with you lulubel that we must not depend solely on what was “voted”. However, I think the cart was before the horse here. If you look at the order of events.

1) God created the world in 6 days
2) Moses wrote it down in Genesis
3) Jesus confirms that this is the case
4) The whole Christian world agrees that this happened
5) Darwin published “Origin of the Species”/SDA church organized
6) Athesits believe that the world was not created in 6 days
7) SDA church puts down their beliefs (vote) including those about creation in a way (they think) is unambiguous
8) Certain SDA Professors start to believe that evolution is a better explanation on how God might have created the world and they twist the words voted previously in the SDA fundamental beliefs to state that they are within the beliefs of the church to continue in this way.
9) The church clarifies there position by voting on a better wording to substantiate a belief that goes back to #2

I hope that the church’s stance is based on #2 (since #1 can’t be verified in a religious sense without #2) rather than #7 or #9.

LSU propaganda
“And Samuel said, Hath the LORD as great delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices, as in obeying the voice of the LORD? Behold, to obey is better than sacrifice, and to hearken than the fat of rams.”

1 Samuel 15:22

Recent Comments by Roger Seheult

Faith without Evidence: Are we really a bunch of ‘Flat Earthers’?
There are too many of them. Where do I start.
Mary Schweitzer’s T-rex.

That’s just off the top….
wait another one –
Walter Veith….
wait more….

Faith without Evidence: Are we really a bunch of ‘Flat Earthers’?
Ad hominum attack means that no other better arguments were available at the time of writing. I win.

Southern Adventist University opens Origins Exhibit
@Ervin Taylor:

I literally have not logged on to this website in years. It looks like the same arguments are going back and forth which means that if you haven’t been able to solve them by now, you aren’t going to convence each other of your points. What is really amazing to me and anyone intersted in the topic, however, is the tone of the comments, which usually reveal the maturity of the writer especially if they include absolutes:

“vast majority of scientifically-informed Adventists will thank Dr.Kent ”

“this misnamed web site”

“Dr. Kent has done a masterful job”

These are usually tip-offs to a lot. Also, it makes me wonder that if Sean Pitman is so ill-informed, and he operates on such a mis-leading web site, why does the good Dr. Taylor waste his time coming to this website, reading the material and then commenting on it? In fact I can bet that Dr. Taylor has spent more time on this web site then I have in the last year – and that speaks volumes about what Dr. Taylor really thinks of this website – perhaps the good Dr. Kent as well.

The Metamorphosis of La Sierra University: an eye-witness account
Again, the question is begged: Why would they work so hard to change the university rather than just leave and go where universities already believe the way you do? Dare I say that there lies a larger conspiracy that transcends LSU and that may be going on at your local SDA instituation? Again, why the push over a generation to change a whole university and to denude it of its fundamentals?

Educate Truth’s purpose and goals
Most of the blogs that are critical of this site aren’t interested in what this site is really out to do. They simply want to demonize it ergo Alinsky’s rule of indetify, demonize, and marginalize. Hence their cherry picking from the comments for their own purposes.

Thanks for the recap though.