Comment on LSU, Pacific Union Conference and North American Division Sued by Faithful Disciple.
LSU Alumnus 1996:
…. Finally – please, please, people – somebody restore my faith in our church by disavowing the absurd notion that if you do not beleive 100% in the Bible than you are against God.
LSU Alumnus 1996, from an “ignoramus” to an enlightened progressive (you) I bring you bad news. It is not going to happen that anyone is going to “restore (your) faith in our church by disavowing the absurd notion that if you do not beleive 100% in the Bible than you are against God.”
The line in the sand has been drawn. It is coming down to one vital question, whether we as a church believe in the Bible – God’s Holy Scriptures, as our reason for faith, or modern society/science. I choose to stay with the Good Book! I feel sorry for you and George Tichy, and the rest who already have, or are ready to abandon our beliefs. You are in a boat without any rudder. Fortunately, EGW saw what was to happen in this time and what you and your liberal/progressive cronies would do to try to destroy the church. But you guys don’t have that benefit because you throw her out too. Listen to what she says.
“The enemy of souls has sought to bring in the supposition that a great reformation was to take place among Seventh-day Adventists, and that this reformation would consist in giving up the doctrines which stand as the pillars of our faith, and engaging in a process of reorganization. Were this reformation to take place, what would result? The principles of truth that God in His wisdom has given to the remnant church, would be discarded. Our religion would be changed. The fundamental principles that have sustained the work for the last fifty years would be accounted as error. A new organization would be established. Books of a new order would be written. A system of intellectual philosophy would be introduced. The founders of this system would go into the cities, and do a wonderful work. The Sabbath of course, would be lightly regarded, as also the God who created it. Nothing would be allowed to stand in the way of the new movement. The leaders would teach that virtue is better than vice, but God being removed, they would place their dependence on human power, which, without God, is worthless. Their foundation would be built on the sand, and storm and tempest would sweep away the structure. Who has authority to begin such a movement? We have our Bibles. We have our experience, attested to by the miraculous working of the Holy Spirit. We have a truth that admits of no compromise. Shall we not repudiate everything that is not in harmony with this truth?” Ellen G. White, Selected Messages, vol. 1, pages 204, 205.
“The days are fast approaching when there will be great perplexity and confusion. Satan, clothed in angel robes, will deceive, if possible, the very elect. There will be gods many and lords many. Every wind of doctrine will be blowing. Those who have rendered supreme homage to “science falsely so called” will not be the leaders then. Those who have trusted to intellect, genius, or talent will not then stand at the head of rank and file. They did not keep pace with the light. Those who have proved themselves unfaithful will not then be entrusted with the flock. In the last solemn work few great men will be engaged. They are self-sufficient, independent of God, and He cannot use them. The Lord has faithful servants, who in the shaking, testing time will be disclosed to view. There are precious ones now hidden who have not bowed the knee to Baal. They have not had the light which has been shining in a concentrated blaze upon you. But it may be under a rough and uninviting exterior the pure brightness of a genuine Christian character will be revealed. In the day time we look toward heaven but do not see the stars. They are there, fixed in the firmament, but the eye cannot distinguish them. In the night we behold their genuine luster.”
“The time is not far distant when the test will come to every soul. The mark of the beast will be urged upon us. Those who have step by step yielded to worldly demands and conformed to worldly customs will not find it a hard matter to yield to the powers that be, rather than subject themselves to derision, insult, threatened imprisonment, and death. The contest is between the commandments of God and the commandments of men. In this time the gold will be separated from the dross in the church. True godliness will be clearly distinguished from the appearance and tinsel of it. Many a star that we have admired for its brilliancy will then go out in darkness. Chaff like a cloud will be borne away on the wind, even from places where we see only floors of rich wheat. All who assume the ornaments of the sanctuary, but are not clothed with Christ’s righteousness, will appear in the shame of their own nakedness.” Ellen G. White, 5 Testimonies pages 80-81
Table of Contents
Faithful Disciple Also Commented
LSU, Pacific Union Conference and North American Division Sued
@Holly Pham:
I will ask this question again. Since the tape was not illegal according to California law, why is it illegal to actual read, publish, or discuss it?
Google search: la sierra university torrent
LSU, Pacific Union Conference and North American Division Sued
[…] Educate Truth – LSU and Adventist Church Sued […]
Recent Comments by Faithful Disciple
Why Vaccinate Kids Against COVID-19?
[…] Based on similar misinformation to that already described, RFK Jr. has removed access to mRNA vaccines against COVID-19 from women and children, claiming that healthy children don’t need to get vaccinated since it is very unlikely for children to die of COVID-19. In response, a lawsuit has been issued, as of July 7, 2025, by six leading medical organizations, including the American Public Health Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the American College of Physicians, the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine and the Massachusetts Public Health Alliance, along with an anonymous pregnant physician, against Robert F. Kennedy Jr., as the current Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) (Link, Link). This lawsuit alleges that Kennedy unlawfully removed COVID-19 vaccine recommendations for children and pregnant women and dismissed expert advisors from the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), replacing them with individuals who espouse anti-vaccine viewpoints. . The fact is that RFK Jr. has no scientific basis for his actions here. The mRNA vaccines have not been shown to harm pregnant women, unborn children, or born children, while at this same time, have shown strong benefits, to include a significant reduction in hospitalizations, long-term injuries (to include Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C) and Long COVID). (Link) […]
Dr. Peter McCullough’s COVID-19 and Anti-Vaccine Theories
[…] The “Largest Autopsy Study” was written by Peter McCullough and others who are also well-known for spreading false and misleading information on vaccines, claimed that: . “There is a high likelihood of a causal link between COVID-19 vaccines and death in most cases.” . This pre-print was withdrawn from The Lancet and later from the journal Forensic Science International in August of 2024. Why? Because of concerns about the paper, including “inappropriate” citations and design methodology; “errors, misrepresentation, and lack of factual support for the conclusions”; along with “failure to recognize and cite disconfirming evidence.” Also note that this paper was based on 44 studies comprising 325 autopsies. What is most interesting is that the authors of the studies themselves came to the opposed conclusion. 105 of the autopsies cited in the McCullough paper came from a single paper from Colombia. The authors of this paper found “no relation between the cause of death and vaccination.” Similarly, the McCullough and his co-authors counted 24 of 28 autopsies from a study from Singapore as vaccine-related, even though the original authors identified “no definite causative relationship” to mRNA vaccines. The authors of a German study also attributed 13 of 18 autopsy deaths to preexisting diseases, but McCullough et al., decided 16 of these cases were vaccine-related. (Link, Link) McCullough and the other authors of his paper didn’t perform the autopsies themselves. They reinterpreted the autopsy cases of others based only on the reports of others and in opposition to how the authors of these reports interpreted their own cases. This isn’t how good science is done. This is an example of simply making stuff up out of this air in an effort to support one’s own preconceived notions of reality. . In short, the autopsy reports come from 14 countries that collectively administered some 2.2 billion vaccine doses. If the COVID-19 vaccines truly were as dangerous as the review authors contend, this would be evident in other data sources — but it’s just not there. Vaccine safety surveillance systems and other studies from across the globe have found that serious side effects can occur, but they are relatively rare. . The Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca vaccines, for example, can, in very rare cases, cause a dangerous and sometimes fatal blood clotting condition combined with low blood platelets. Rarely, the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines from Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech have caused inflammation of the heart muscle or surrounding tissue, known as myocarditis or pericarditis in young men after the second dose. In comparison, the COVID-19 infection itself was much more commonly associated with myopericarditis and with much greater severity and risk of death. It’s just that the benefits outweighed the risks. There are risks, as there are for everything, but what conspiracy theorists and anti-vaxxers do is falsely enhance the risks while minimizing the benefits. (Link) […]
Review of “The Naked Emperor” by Pastor Conrad Vine
[…] O pastor Conrad Vine, então presidente da Adventist Frontier Missions (AFM), emergiu como figura central na polêmica sobre vacinação obrigatória durante a pandemia. Conhecido por sua defesa ferrenha da liberdade individual, ele se posicionou publicamente contra as políticas institucionais da Igreja, que apoiaram exigências de imunização youtube.com+3educatetruth.com+3educatetruth.com+3. […]
The Arguments of Adventists Opposed to Vaccines
[…] Smallpox was also a scourge in her day, so much so that she did not oppose the use of vaccines as an aid to help the human immune system better fight against smallpox infections. Even though she did have a bad experience when vaccinating her children when they were young, she did not oppose her adult son, William, when he and his associates were vaccinated for smallpox – and was likely vaccinated against smallpox herself (Link). […]
Pastor James Rafferty on Religious Liberty and Vaccines
[…] the VAERS database was able to detect rare adverse effects, such as Guillain-Barré syndrome, and myocarditis in young men following the second dose of the mRNA vaccines (Link). However, contrary to Dr. […]
