All you evolutionists – please don’t listen to the following. This …

Comment on Ted Wilson: “We will not flinch. We will not be deterred.” by Roger Seheult.

All you evolutionists – please don’t listen to the following.

This is for those who believe in the soon return of Jesus Christ – you know – to save us from sin and death (as opposed to death saving the human race)

The GC president is firming up the final show down that must occur between those that will either agree with the church or those that will leave (shaking). Make no mistake that God will preserve his church on this planet. However, don’t place all you faith in one man (I am sure that Mr. Wilson would be the first to agree).

Remember that our leader is in heaven and he will continue to use his servants do carry on his patient work. May he come soon.

Roger Seheult Also Commented

Ted Wilson: “We will not flinch. We will not be deterred.”
Bobbie. I have been having the same feelings regarding your post. I often wondered what the results would be if we did a survey of Adventist and were able to get everyone to answer the following questions:

1) Do you believe that the earth was created in 6 literal days?
2) Do you believe that Ellen G. White was God’s Prophet and that her writings were inspired by the same power that inspired the Bible.
3) Do you believe that the Seventh-Day Adventist Church is the remnant and has the “truth” for the last days of earth’s history.
4) Do you believe that the Sabbath (Friday night to Saturday night) are sacred hours blessed by none other that God himself and that keeping this time Holy will be a test in the last days of earth’s history.

Those four simple questions would be very interesting to ask. I don’t know what percent of all adventists would answers “Yes” to them – and that would not what I would be interested in anyhow. What I would be interested in specifically was how connected the answers would be. In other words, hom many times would the answers ALL be “Yes” or “No”.

In my opinion, I would say that very few people would answer the questions differently. I think there would be a very highly correlated degree of similarity between how these questions would be answered.

Therefore, my assertion is that those Adventists that would answer “No” to #1 would also answer “No” to at least once other questions (and probably ALL other answers).

The next question is why? I have no answer for this one but it might tell you why Ellen G. White’s writings do not surface on this web site (even though I highly esteem her comments on this subject). It would be interesting to hear from people that answer “No” to #1 but Yes to any other of my questions (especially #2).


Ted Wilson: “We will not flinch. We will not be deterred.”
@Ken:

I guess my sarcasm was lost in the bytes…

Re Roger’s quote“All you evolutionists – please don’t listen to the following”Dear RogerIs this indicative of the compassion of Jesus? Who judges the judges?RegardsKen  (Quote)


Ted Wilson: “We will not flinch. We will not be deterred.”
@Lydian Belknap:

Stop this! Don’t you know that only science can tell you the truth. The Bible is full of tales.

Good job.


Recent Comments by Roger Seheult

Faith without Evidence: Are we really a bunch of ‘Flat Earthers’?
There are too many of them. Where do I start. https://www.swau.edu/dinosaur-research-draws-world-wide-acclaim-inspires-new-tv-series
Mary Schweitzer’s T-rex.

That’s just off the top….
wait another one –
Walter Veith….
wait more….


Faith without Evidence: Are we really a bunch of ‘Flat Earthers’?
Ad hominum attack means that no other better arguments were available at the time of writing. I win.


Southern Adventist University opens Origins Exhibit
@Ervin Taylor:

I literally have not logged on to this website in years. It looks like the same arguments are going back and forth which means that if you haven’t been able to solve them by now, you aren’t going to convence each other of your points. What is really amazing to me and anyone intersted in the topic, however, is the tone of the comments, which usually reveal the maturity of the writer especially if they include absolutes:

Examples:
“vast majority of scientifically-informed Adventists will thank Dr.Kent ”

“this misnamed web site”

“Dr. Kent has done a masterful job”

These are usually tip-offs to a lot. Also, it makes me wonder that if Sean Pitman is so ill-informed, and he operates on such a mis-leading web site, why does the good Dr. Taylor waste his time coming to this website, reading the material and then commenting on it? In fact I can bet that Dr. Taylor has spent more time on this web site then I have in the last year – and that speaks volumes about what Dr. Taylor really thinks of this website – perhaps the good Dr. Kent as well.


The Metamorphosis of La Sierra University: an eye-witness account
Again, the question is begged: Why would they work so hard to change the university rather than just leave and go where universities already believe the way you do? Dare I say that there lies a larger conspiracy that transcends LSU and that may be going on at your local SDA instituation? Again, why the push over a generation to change a whole university and to denude it of its fundamentals?


Educate Truth’s purpose and goals
Most of the blogs that are critical of this site aren’t interested in what this site is really out to do. They simply want to demonize it ergo Alinsky’s rule of indetify, demonize, and marginalize. Hence their cherry picking from the comments for their own purposes.

Thanks for the recap though.