George: The last line probably needs to read, ” . . …

Comment on LSU’s public relations man calls Educate Truth ‘attack website’ by David Read.

George:

The last line probably needs to read, ” . . . played no role in the development of life on this earth prior to Adam’s sin.”

Some additional scriptural references: Genesis 5:1-2; Exodus 31:17; Deuteronomy 4:32; 2 Kings 19:15; 2 Chronicles 2:12; Nehemiah 9:6; Job 9:6-9; Psalms 8:3-6; 90:2; 100:3; 102:25; 115:15; 124:8; 136:5-9; 146:5-6; Proverbs 8:27-29; Ecclesiastes 7:29; Isaiah 37:16; 40:26-28; 42:5; 45:12, 18; 66:1-2; Jeremiah 10:12; 27:5; 32:17; 51:15; Amos 5:8; Matthew 19:4-6; Mark 10:6; Acts 14:15; 17:24-28; I Timothy 2:13; Heb. 2:7; 2 Peter 3:5-6; Revelation 10:6; 14:7.

David Read Also Commented

LSU’s public relations man calls Educate Truth ‘attack website’
“In this light, Educate Truth thought to work with Blackmer privately to shield him from the repercussions of his own words. He requested the transcript be taken off the website, as it was bringing him trouble from LSU lawyers and jeopardizing his ministry. The only reason Educate Truth removed this transcript was to alleviate Blackmer’s predicament.”

Did I read that correctly? Let me see if I have this straight. Larry Blackmer is the Vice President for Education of the North American Division of the Seventh-day Adventist Church. And he got a threatening letter from an attorney purporting to represent LaSierra University?????

I think it is time to cut LaSierra loose, and sue it to force it to make clear in all of its promotion and advertising that it has no affiliation whatsoever with the Adventist Church.


LSU’s public relations man calls Educate Truth ‘attack website’
@Larry Blackmer:

It is certainly good to hear that accreditation is not actually being held over LaSierra in an effort to force the school to continue to teach evolution as truth. I didn’t believe this was the case, but the apologists for what is happening at LSU continually argue that upholding SDA doctrines puts accreditation at risk. It is nice to hear from an authoritative source that this is just what I thought it was: nonsense.


Recent Comments by David Read

The Reptile King
Poor Larry Geraty! He can’t understand why anyone would think him sympathetic to theistic evolution. Well, for starters, he wrote this for Spectrum last year:

“Christ tells us they will know us by our love, not by our commitment to a seven literal historical, consecutive, contiguous 24-hour day week of creation 6,000 years ago which is NOT in Genesis no matter how much the fundamentalist wing of the church would like to see it there.”

“Fundamental Belief No. 6 uses Biblical language to which we can all agree; once you start interpreting it according to anyone’s preference you begin to cut out members who have a different interpretation. I wholeheartedly affirm Scripture, but NOT the extra-Biblical interpretation of the Michigan Conference.”

So the traditional Adventist interpretation of Genesis is an “extra-Biblical interpretation” put forward by “the fundamentalist wing” of the SDA Church? What are people supposed to think about Larry Geraty’s views?

It is no mystery how LaSierra got in the condition it is in.


The Reptile King
Professor Kent says:

“I don’t do ‘orgins science.’ Not a single publication on the topic. I study contemporary biology. Plenty of publications.”

So, if you did science that related to origins, you would do it pursuant to the biblical paradigm, that is pursuant to the assumption that Genesis 1-11 is true history, correct?


The Reptile King
Well, Jeff, would it work better for you if we just closed the biology and religion departments? I’m open to that as a possible solution.


The Reptile King
Larry Geraty really did a job on LaSierra. Personally I think it is way gone, compromised beyond hope. The SDA Church should just cut its ties to LaSierra, and cut its losses.

As to the discussion on this thread, round up the usual suspects and their usual arguments.


La Sierra University Resignation Saga: Stranger-than-Fiction
It is a remarkably fair and unbiased article, and a pretty fair summary of what was said in the recorded conversation.