Comment on The Sabbath’s relevance to the debate about origins by Phil Mills.
Steve Moranâ€™s comments serve to illustrate four classic ways sin effects all of us. When we understand these four universal effects of sin, we gain more understanding into ourselves as well as the words and actions of others.
The honest person is trusting, but to a thief, everyone is a thief. The adulterer assumes everyone else commits adultery. The hypocrite imagines all others to be hypocrites. The evolutionists suspects that everyone else is a doubter. Evolutionists within the church attempt to portray the church as full of believers in evolution (â€œone in every churchâ€), La Sierra attempts to paint all Adventist schools as riddled with doubters.
But even if the charges were true, multitudes holding error do not transform the wrong into right. We do not to follow a multitude to do evil (Ex 23:2).
It is not the multitudes that find and enter the strait gait. Truth is truth, not because it is held by the many and the mighty, but because it is truth. Neither our acceptance nor our rejection of Godâ€™s word determines its accuracy and truthfulness. It is not us who judge Godâ€™s word, it is Godâ€™s word which judges us.
The evil doer is sensitive to the same evil deeds in others. â€œIt takes one to know one.â€ The drug addict can easily spot drug addicts. The drug addict is quickly detected by the drug pusher. Evolutionists easily recognize disbelief in others.
Like Eve, the sinner is not content to sin alone. The sinner will always justify and promote his sin. At first, sin is committed in secret, but over time sin hardens us and we become increasingly bold and defiant in justifying our sin.
Since Satan misquoted Scripture (Mt 4:6) it is not surprising that his agents do the same. Many wrested Scripture to their own destruction (2Pet 3:16) and this will continue to the end of time.
It is a basic pattern of Satan to make the simple seem complicated. There is nothing complicated about understanding the creation account unless we are â€œwise above that which is written.â€
In Genesis 1 God gave us the absolutely accurate history of the creation of our world. The details are further amplified in Genesis 2 (and in other places of Scripture). There are not two conflicting accounts. Only the criminally negligent or the willfully blind could possibly fail to see this.
Evil doers always finds other evil doers who share in their evil. These band together in bundles (Mt 13:30, Ps 83:5, Rev 17:13)
The drug addict always finds drug sellers. So the deceived apostate “Adventist” evolutionist finds others who will share and promote his view.
We gain comfort and sympathy in our sin from others who share our views or at least lack conviction of the truth. But the day hastens when â€œthe hail will sweep away the refuge of lies) (Isa 28:18) that we rely upon. Too late we will discover that our subterfuge will not help us. And with every abominable thing we will discover that outside the Holy City will be â€œwhoever loves â€¦ a lieâ€ (Mat 22:15).
Recent Comments by Phil Mills
Back to Square One…
David, here is a familiar statement I like with instruction for what I can do AT THIS TIME:
“At this time we must gather warmth from the coldness of others, courage from their cowardice, and loyalty from their treason” (5T 136).
If apostates are fearless about trumpeting their apostasy, why should I not be even more emboldened with the truth. Error has no future. Gaddafi was a strong man yesterday, where is he today?
What we sow we reap (Gal 6:7) is a law throughout the universe. Sow faith, reap faith. Sow hope, reap hope. Sow love, reap love.
There are two sources of seeds to sow. One source is the word of God. The other is the enemy. One sows good seed, the other tares. By the command of God, the tares must grow till harvest (Mt 13:30). The fruit alone can expose the seed for what it is. The seeds of darkness and doubt that have been sown for 6,000 years must fully ripen.
We are not surprised by anything today, because the harvest is near and the fruit is ripening. But though there will be a pitiful harvest of evil, I rejoice that there is a much more abundant harvest of righteousness. We can see it by faith. The word of God is not going to return void. The weeds of sin are not sufficient to crowd out the harvest of righteousness. The death of Christ, his mediation in heaven are not in vain. Sin, and those who insist on clinging to it, will be destroyed, while those who cling to Jesus have a sure refuge.
It is interesting how easily three can be dropped from the board when leadership decides to act.
How wise God is. As He has done in the past, so He works in the present. He removes our excuses and lets us reveal reveal our true character by the varying circumstances of life.
We could multiply examples. The Cain that was too kind to “cruelly” kill a lamb for a sacrifice in obedience to God’s command, could easily kill Abel in defiance of God’s command. King Saul, who was too merciful to execute Agag in obedience to God’s command, could kill the high priest in disobedience to God’s command.
Thus it has been through history. Ellen White makes insightful observations about Uriah Smith’s being too weak to provide energetic leadership for right, yet being plenty strong to provide energetic leadership for wrong in the original Battle Creek College crisis of the early 1880’s.
We have certainly seen this same pattern at La Sierra. The same leaders that could not seem to act decisively and firmly when God’s character and truth were under attack, suddenly found the decision and firmness to fire the four men who attacked their own character.
Now other LSU leaders who can’t act decisively in the face of rebellion against the church can suddenly act decisively against those who are seeking harmony with the church. All this reveals that these leaders could have acted decisively and firmly all along, IF THEY CHOSE.
Of course, it should help us reflect on our own lives. What are we revealing by our own inconsistencies?
Former board member never talked with biology faculty
I wonder if “due process” was afforded those who were dropped, since that is very important for accreditation. I wonder if this is being explored.
ken: If I understand Phil correctly, the SDA church is a form or a representative democracy where each local church gets to vote upon and elect its delegates to the GC
No. That is not true. Each local congregation votes it’s representatives to a conference constituency meeting. The constituency votes the conference officers. Conferences then may vote representatives for unions and union constituencies. Unions and division organizations then have representatives at the general conference. At the general conference level it is quite removed from the local church representative. But I am still over simplifying.
Ken, you couldn’t be farther from understanding me.
This is NOT doctrinal change, it is merely attempting to better express the doctrine that has always been taught in the Bible and generally held by the membership of the Seventh-day Adventist church. There isn’t a marginal doctrine in the lot of the 28 fundamental beliefs.
The church doesn’t make doctrines only the Bible can make doctrine. Bible truth and Bible doctrines don’t care a straw about committees or majorities, neither does it change regardless of the views and votes of others.
To understand the phrase commonly used by Adventist “truth is progressive” is to understand that a first grader learns simple truth, then building on the truths he moves to second grade and continues to add to the basic truths and how to apply them to life.
1. Truth is objective, not merely subjective. Truth has evidence. The best possible evidence of truth is that God says it. But other evidence, such as the evidence of science, while weaker, is available. Science cannot “prove” God’s word, but when properly understood, will always provide documentation to the truthfulness of God’s word.
2. Progression is not a rejection of old truth, but a building on, an amplification of previously discovered truth.
Error never will evolve into truth, it simply mutants into greater and greater error.
Truth never changes. It remains far more stable than the Rock of Gibralter. God creates in my heart a love for the truth. As I investigate more and more carefully the word of God, my understanding of life becomes more and more accurate. I can change, but truth does not.
In the area of doctrine: Only the Bible can make true doctrine. The church can only express a summary of key Bible doctrines in a statement of belief.
There is no contemplation of changing doctrine in the modification of the wording of the churches belief. It is simply clarifying its original intent.
And if the church abandoned its fundamental beliefs, as the Jews did, and many Christians did, the truth has not changed. Because truth and doctrine is not democratically determined, all that has happened is that a group of people have united to leave the truth. We call it apostasy. Sadly it has happened to groups in the past (see John 6 and the multitudes leaving Jesus) and sadly it happens sometimes to individuals even within the Seventh-day Adventist church today.