Shane, thanks so much for that clear and concise description …

Comment on Educate Truth’s purpose and goals by David Read.

Shane, thanks so much for that clear and concise description of the goals of this website. You have a calling to do this task and you are doing it well.

The role of “whistle-blower” is never easy. The Darwinists/theological liberals will hate you for exposing them; they prefer to carry out their corrosive agenda in secret, or if not in secret at least “under the radar.” The administrators, conference presidents, board chairmen, etc., even though they may be and often are creationists/conservatives don’t like this sort of thing either. They see their task as making the trains run on time. They don’t like controversy, and want to project the image that we are all gung ho, all on the same page, everything is just great, things are going along fine, etc. So you will incur the wrath of both the liberals and the highly placed conservatives.

But if it is any consolation to you, the majority of the Adventist believers in the pews agree with what you’re doing.

Recent Comments by David Read

The Reptile King
Poor Larry Geraty! He can’t understand why anyone would think him sympathetic to theistic evolution. Well, for starters, he wrote this for Spectrum last year:

“Christ tells us they will know us by our love, not by our commitment to a seven literal historical, consecutive, contiguous 24-hour day week of creation 6,000 years ago which is NOT in Genesis no matter how much the fundamentalist wing of the church would like to see it there.”

“Fundamental Belief No. 6 uses Biblical language to which we can all agree; once you start interpreting it according to anyone’s preference you begin to cut out members who have a different interpretation. I wholeheartedly affirm Scripture, but NOT the extra-Biblical interpretation of the Michigan Conference.”

So the traditional Adventist interpretation of Genesis is an “extra-Biblical interpretation” put forward by “the fundamentalist wing” of the SDA Church? What are people supposed to think about Larry Geraty’s views?

It is no mystery how LaSierra got in the condition it is in.


The Reptile King
Professor Kent says:

“I don’t do ‘orgins science.’ Not a single publication on the topic. I study contemporary biology. Plenty of publications.”

So, if you did science that related to origins, you would do it pursuant to the biblical paradigm, that is pursuant to the assumption that Genesis 1-11 is true history, correct?


The Reptile King
Well, Jeff, would it work better for you if we just closed the biology and religion departments? I’m open to that as a possible solution.


The Reptile King
Larry Geraty really did a job on LaSierra. Personally I think it is way gone, compromised beyond hope. The SDA Church should just cut its ties to LaSierra, and cut its losses.

As to the discussion on this thread, round up the usual suspects and their usual arguments.


La Sierra University Resignation Saga: Stranger-than-Fiction
It is a remarkably fair and unbiased article, and a pretty fair summary of what was said in the recorded conversation.