Re. Warren Johns, a name that always comes up in …

Comment on Creationist students find little support from LSU by wesley kime.

Re. Warren Johns, a name that always comes up in such discussions, as it just has above, there are two men with this name, holding significantly different views. Warren L johns believes devoutly in the lateral 6-day creation, and was an early champion of Creation on the web, long before this site and before Sean Pitman’s, personally funding several sites. The current one is http://www.genesisfile.com/. He has written and published two books on the Creationism and against Evo. Now in his 80s and retired to Tennessee, that Warren Johns is a lawyer and represented the General Conference for many decades. The other is Warren Harvey Johns, middle aged, variously a professor at Andrews and currently working in the LLU Heritage library, both a theologian and an MA in geology, a new sort of SDA “long chronology” academic, and coauthor of the now well known book on Adventism and Creationism, principal author Brian Bull. Be careful which Warren Johns you are talking about.

Recent Comments by wesley kime

Video show LSU undermining church doctrine
@David Read: In the comments of this date (May 14) reference is again made to “Warren Johns,” not otherwise specified. Once again I call attention to the fact that there are TWO men by that name, Warren H. Johns, the author of the “temple” notion above cited, actively promoting various forms of theistic Evo, and Warren L. Johns, most assuredly of the contrary view, very actively promoting the 6-day, SDA Creationism


Adventist Review examines LSU conflict
If the 6-day Creation is not to be taken literally, how can the 7th-day Sabbath be taken seriously?


Private: La Sierra’s misleading PR campaign
If the 6-day Creation is not to be taken literally, how can the 7th-day Sabbath be taken seriously?


Deal with LSU
That LSU Senatorial Postmodernist Manifesto leaked, of all places, from Erv Taylor’s PostAdventistToday, pretty funny piece, actually, LOL. Serious students of postmodernism know that since Derrida’s derisory deconstructionism postmodernism’s main mode is whimsy. Nothing is absolute, chuckle chuckle, especially Genesis 1, chuckle chuckle. Seriously, folks, it could be a hoax, lighten up. Or old Erv’s idea of satire a la Sartre. By the same token, it can’t be taken too seriously. Not a laughing matter. So much for the half-time comedy break.