Comment on GC Votes to Revise SDA Fundamental #6 on Creation by Nathan.
The moving of the Holy Spirit in this vote is to be praised. The compassionate Creator is honored. Significantly, by this Holy-Spirit-led-vote by the world Seventh-day Adventist Church in General Conference session, the Holy Spirit has just publicly endorsed to the world the historical, literal interpretation of Genesis 1-11. With Zecharias, we can say, “Blessed be the Lord God of Israel†(Luke 1:68).
Table of Contents
Nathan Also Commented
GC Votes to Revise SDA Fundamental #6 on Creation
@Ron Stone M.D.: Yes sir, I most assuredly know which one is correct, I think you do as well. God bless!
GC Votes to Revise SDA Fundamental #6 on Creation
It is just that mainstream science journals do not publish those articles that question fundamental aspects of modern evolutionary theory
My point exactly, a biased system. [edit]
GC Votes to Revise SDA Fundamental #6 on Creation
When I visit the biology department websites at SDA colleges, I am seeing some faculty who publish a LOT of articles in peer-reviewed scientific journals. (Quote)
Please enlighten me on these peer-reviewed scientific journals and the SDA scientist articles that were published.
Recent Comments by Nathan
The Reptile King
I have misquoted you (Dr. Geraty) in the flying planes statement and I do sincerely apologize for my misquote.
The Reptile King
@Sean Pitman: Not only does Geraty “subscribes to theistic evolutionism as the true model of origins:” He also states that those opposed to this storytelling of origins (conservative Adventism)are “the type that fly planes into buildings”. Scary that this man was the president of an Adventist Insitution. With this kind of thinking, I wonder if he would have locked up EGW and the rest of the pioneers in Gitmo if they were alive today?
Clifford Goldstein: ‘A Safe Place’
Adventist kid: BobRyan,You contribute in quite a number of places. I noticed your edits on wikipedia. May I suggest that you go read the responses of others to your verbose essays on that site?Young Earth Creationism is unscientific. That is all there is to it. So either Adventism and Science are mutually exclusive (that can’t be!) or we can both believe in Science (evolution), and the bible while being Adventist. I take the second option.
Could you share the wikipedia link with us if possible, thanks.
LSU student: ‘Apostates or Apostles’?
Seems to me that Dr. Bradley hardly represents a true follower of Christ, aside from his rather “colorful” language which by the way lost him all due credibility as a “Christian”. Furthermore Dr. Bradley contradicts himself in his own quotes, which I found to be rather disturbing. Hey, I guess lying seems to be the thing to do these days to cover ones own dissent into apostasy and blatant lack of trust in God’s word.
At least be honest with yourself and others if you dont believe in something, isnt that the Christian thing to do?
Sadly, Dr. Bradley lost all my trust and faith in him as a professor of Adventist higher education.
Adventist Review: Pastors Who Don’t Believe
[Off topic post deleted. You can send me a personal E-mail if you wish. – sp]
