Comment on Northern California Conference Votes to Act Independent of the General Conference by Sean Pitman.
Again, I think this has to do with the morality of a person, not so much the gender of a person. You must realize that the Bible was written by men for men. It is very gender biased. However, just because various statements are directed at men in particular (as in the Ten Commandments for instance) doesn’t mean that they don’t apply to women as well. You have to overcome this implication before you can clearly make the claim that God only views men as being capable of being in leadership positions within His church – especially since He chose a woman to be a prophet for this church and to help set up and lead this church during its earliest formative years as a pastor/leader to His flock… ordained by His own hands for her leadership and pastoral role within the church.
Sean Pitman Also Commented
Northern California Conference Votes to Act Independent of the General Conference
LOL 😉
Northern California Conference Votes to Act Independent of the General Conference
Thanks…
Northern California Conference Votes to Act Independent of the General Conference
I still fail to see an explicit statement forbidding the ordination of women pastors here…
Recent Comments by Sean Pitman
After the Flood
Thank you Ariel. Hope you are doing well these days. Miss seeing you down at Loma Linda. Hope you had a Great Thanksgiving!
The Flood
Thank you Colin. Just trying to save lives any way I can. Not everything that the government does or leaders do is “evil” BTW…
The Flood
Only someone who knows the future can make such decisions without being a monster…
Pacific Union College Encouraging Homosexual Marriage?
Where did I “gloss over it”?
Review of “The Naked Emperor” by Pastor Conrad Vine
I fail to see where you have convincingly supported your claim that the GC leadership contributed to the harm of anyone’s personal religious liberties? – given that the GC leadership does not and could not override personal religious liberties in this country, nor substantively change the outcome of those who lost their jobs over various vaccine mandates. That’s just not how it works here in this country. Religious liberties are personally derived. Again, they simply are not based on a corporate or church position, but rely solely upon individual convictions – regardless of what the church may or may not say or do.
Yet, you say, “Who cares if it is written into law”? You should care. Everyone should care. It’s a very important law in this country. The idea that the organized church could have changed vaccine mandates simply isn’t true – particularly given the nature of certain types of jobs dealing with the most vulnerable in society (such as health care workers for example).
Beyond this, the GC Leadership did, in fact, write in support of personal religious convictions on this topic – and there are GC lawyers who have and continue to write personal letters in support of personal religious convictions (even if these personal convictions are at odds with the position of the church on a given topic). Just because the GC leadership also supports the advances of modern medicine doesn’t mean that the GC leadership cannot support individual convictions at the same time. Both are possible. This is not an inconsistency.
