After anthologizing in detail, and collating thanks to clip & …

Comment on La Sierra and Battle Creek College by wesley kime.

After anthologizing in detail, and collating thanks to clip & paste, your plethora of posts for just the last 3 days, and studying all the data as I would a patient’s chart, I, a mere MD, must acknowledge I’m lost. Never seen a case quite like it. Is this – as you say in academia – your logic? “I believe in 6-day creation despite every last bit of evidence being for evolution, not a shred, not a darn-shredy-shred-shred-shred for the Bible’s say so, or for God’s, or God, or anything, and since God created everything, like doc #6 says, He created evil too – so I’m of more faith, plus more logical, than Dr. Pitman who is a divisive, arrogant cybergangster as mean-spirited as weak-minded, and he must not open his mouth one more time?” But that can’t really be what you are really trying to say, not really, can it? Must have misstated you again, sir; so sorry.

wesley kime Also Commented

La Sierra and Battle Creek College
@Sean Pitman: In keeping with the liturgical response professorially established (vida supra): amen!


La Sierra and Battle Creek College
@Paul Giem: Dr. Giem: exceptionally well stated.


La Sierra and Battle Creek College
Once upon a time, when science was young, there were such things as hypotheses and counter hypotheses, theory and counter theory, with data assumed to validate one or the other, or, alas, both. Once upon a time, at the beginning, evolutionists recognized evolution as only a theory and that there was evidence against it. Now suddenly and somehow evolutionists are saying evolution is not a theory but science. Not just science but THE science, the ONLY science. Science incarnate. Not just a scientific theory, not just science, but a law of science, THE law of science. And there is no such thing as evidence against it or for creation. How could there be? Hardly science, mere myth, don’t dare call it, gasp!, science, it cannot be called science except in quotation marks, “science,” and cannot be taught in an accredited peer-reviewed science course, only (with a wink) in philosophy 101, or a seminary (with increasing disinterest). That’s what evolutionists are now declaring, and taking to court. And now we have 6-day creationist-believing SDA professors broadcasting that too?


Recent Comments by wesley kime

Dr. Walter Veith and the anti-vaccine arguments of Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche
Informative and stimulating, but proceeding into more confusion. A veteran of Moderna vaccinations, I trust, hope, they are effective, at least until otherwise. The whole business, being part of End Times, is in the hands of God, not humans expert and as degreed as they may be.


Brilliant and Beautiful, but Wrong
Brilliant, beautiful, and so right! Speaking of your presentation at LLU recently. Great to see you and your family (especially my namesake, Wes. God bless! WK


Complex Organisms are Degenerating – Rapidly
@Bob Helm: Dr. Sanford is very familiar to most of us. He was invited to speak at LLU several years ago and I and a great many were privileged to hear him.


Evolution from Space?
Hats off yet again to Sean for pursuing this topic as a scientist should, no nonsense, and in it’s proper setting — as a revival of one of the ancient ideas recently upgraded as a desperate alternative to the increasingly compelling intelligent design data. I had occasion to review panspermia a few years ago and as is my wont I found it more amusing than scientific. If you would like what was intended to be a satirical response to panspermia and other related curiosities you could check out: http://www.iessaythere.com/black-hole-humor.html
Meantime, Sean’s article is of far more cogent worth.


The Sabbath and the Covenants (Old vs. New)
As he has done on this site many times, Sean in his line-by-line-item response to C. White (not EG or EB) has, to my mind, clearly enunciated the issue and resolution.

When all the hermeneutics, quoting, and arguing and inordinately judgmental riposte are over, it comes down, as I understand it, to two things: 1) Whether the 7th day Sabbath (whether enunciated in the famous 10 commandments or otherwise) is still valid, and 2) Does the grace obtained by the vicarious sacrifice by the shedding of Christ’s blood or other divine process too deep for us to understand in this life, cover every sin automatically and without ado, altogether passively on our part, or is it only on condition that we first totally and deeply accept it? Other details always hassled forever are distractions.

I accept that I must accept it, wholly, actively, even with agony, with my whole being.