@George: Why, I believe you asked, the turtle prime? Why of …

Comment on Something From “Nothing”? by wesley kime.

@George:
Why, I believe you asked, the turtle prime?
Why of course to be the top and not the bottom
Of that one-on-one that turtles naturally climb
Thus to form our earth-sustaining column.

wesley kime Also Commented

Something From “Nothing”?
@george:
But now, with-luck-iambic friend, you’re sounding
Downright quantum-beer besot Platonically confounding.
Are you coming or going, virtual reality abounding?
Nappy time for frail aged me. Wake me up in time
For another round of poesy, hopefully not sublime.


Something From “Nothing”?
@George:
Well, my dearest George, hello and fancy meeting you here
Among the M&Ms a-rippling in your crafted quantum beer
Besotting Dawkins, Hawkings, Vilenkin, Krauss, et al,
Particulate and articulate are they, derived from nothing at all.


Something From “Nothing”?
Exactly the synthesis and anthology I’ve been waiting for. It should be published as at least a booklet. Thanks.


Recent Comments by wesley kime

Dr. Walter Veith and the anti-vaccine arguments of Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche
Informative and stimulating, but proceeding into more confusion. A veteran of Moderna vaccinations, I trust, hope, they are effective, at least until otherwise. The whole business, being part of End Times, is in the hands of God, not humans expert and as degreed as they may be.


Brilliant and Beautiful, but Wrong
Brilliant, beautiful, and so right! Speaking of your presentation at LLU recently. Great to see you and your family (especially my namesake, Wes. God bless! WK


Complex Organisms are Degenerating – Rapidly
@Bob Helm: Dr. Sanford is very familiar to most of us. He was invited to speak at LLU several years ago and I and a great many were privileged to hear him.


Evolution from Space?
Hats off yet again to Sean for pursuing this topic as a scientist should, no nonsense, and in it’s proper setting — as a revival of one of the ancient ideas recently upgraded as a desperate alternative to the increasingly compelling intelligent design data. I had occasion to review panspermia a few years ago and as is my wont I found it more amusing than scientific. If you would like what was intended to be a satirical response to panspermia and other related curiosities you could check out: http://www.iessaythere.com/black-hole-humor.html
Meantime, Sean’s article is of far more cogent worth.


The Sabbath and the Covenants (Old vs. New)
As he has done on this site many times, Sean in his line-by-line-item response to C. White (not EG or EB) has, to my mind, clearly enunciated the issue and resolution.

When all the hermeneutics, quoting, and arguing and inordinately judgmental riposte are over, it comes down, as I understand it, to two things: 1) Whether the 7th day Sabbath (whether enunciated in the famous 10 commandments or otherwise) is still valid, and 2) Does the grace obtained by the vicarious sacrifice by the shedding of Christ’s blood or other divine process too deep for us to understand in this life, cover every sin automatically and without ado, altogether passively on our part, or is it only on condition that we first totally and deeply accept it? Other details always hassled forever are distractions.

I accept that I must accept it, wholly, actively, even with agony, with my whole being.