The ID movement does not intend to “honor God”. And they …

Comment on Angry Scientists: Publishing on Intelligent Design by Academic.

The ID movement does not intend to “honor God”.

And they have succeeded in their intent. As it is written, “The wisdom of the prudent is to give thought to their ways, but the folly of fools is deception” (Proverbs 14:8). Likewise, “A fool’s lips bring him strife, and his mouth invites a beating” (Proverbs 18:6).

Academic Also Commented

Angry Scientists: Publishing on Intelligent Design

You’re referencing the opinions of Eugene Shubert as “the” definition of science?!

I thought I was referencing a consensus of scientific opinions compiled by Shubert and denied by you.

Really? The same Eugene Shubert who claimed to have been given personal Divine revelations directly from God Himself?

I haven’t read that. But I have read of Georg Cantor’s belief of having received the mathematical theory of transfinite numbers directly from God. And I have read Cantor’s understanding of the meaning of science. It agrees perfectly with the list of definitions compiled by Shubert.


Angry Scientists: Publishing on Intelligent Design

It is easy to simply declare that I’m obviously wrong. It is quite another thing to clearly explain why. – Sean Pitman

You are right for asserting that God created life (Isaiah 45:7 NIV). You are wrong for not seeing the great evil of the Intelligent Design movement and you are wrong for refusing to discern the definition of science.


Angry Scientists: Publishing on Intelligent Design

If you don’t want to answer a very simple and sincere question, just say so…

I rather affirm that the ID movement does not honor God. I believe that’s the point of Judgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial.