The Sabbath’s relevance to the debate about origins

By David C. Read 4. There is a repeated argument unless one believes in six recent literal 24-hour days of creation the validity of Scripture is undermined. Is this really true? We do lots of interpretation of stories in the Bible that are very literal and very concrete. No Adventist really literally believes Luke 16:19-31,…

La Sierra and Battle Creek College

The situation at the La Sierra University Biology Department is reviewed, including material recommended by the Biology Department. A comparison is made with the situation at Battle Creek College, and Ellen White’s response to the situation. For reference, read 5T 21-36. Speaker: Paul Giem Second Look Seminars, most Saturday Mornings at 10:00am at Mortensen Hall,…

Faith without Evidence: Are we really a bunch of ‘Flat Earthers’?

By Sean Pitman The following discussion is based on Lawrence Geraty’s (retired president of LSU and supporter of long-age views of origins) review of the creation presentations given at the General Conference in Atlanta – as originally published by Spectrum. @Ken: Clausen sees the Sabbath as symbolizing what Anselm said about “faith seeking understanding.” In…

Creation Debate in the Seventh-day Adventist Church

This article can be found in the July 2010 Biblical Research Institute’s newsletter Reflections. By Gerhard Pfandl At the Annual Council in 2001 the General Conference Executive Committee organized a series of conferences on faith and science during the years 2002-2004. The first conference in 2002 was an international conference in Ogden, Utah. More than…