Source: Adventist Today
Update 2/2/10: It has been brought to our attention that the original date of November 6, 2009, is missing from the La Sierra University Faculty Senate’s resolution, as reported above. Erv Taylor, our publisher asked me to post the Senate’s resolution. Since no date came with it I assumed that it was very recent. This is a good lesson not to assume anything when it comes to posting on the AT site. As the online editor of Adventist Today, and on behalf of the AT staff, we sincerely apologize for any misunderstanding this may have caused. We will continue to improve on our commitment to publish or post only that which represents our efforts to reach the highest standards of journalistic excellence and integrity, as stated in our Guiding Principles. I stand by that commitment. For any questions or inquiries related to this matter, please contact the publisher, Erv Taylor, at erv.taylor@atoday.com
Sincerely
Marcel Schwantes
Online Editor, Adventist Today


February 3, 2010
There you go. I figured this relatively minor oversight probably wasn’t deliberate on the part of Schwantes… and I believe her.
But, this still doesn’t change the fact that the LSU Senate is clearly making a statement in support of “academic freedom” for professors to be able to teach their students ideas that directly undermine the fundamental ideals of the SDA Church – on the Church’s dime. That’s the real issue here. Let’s not get sidetracked on little stuff…
Sean Pitman
http://www.DetectingDesign.com
February 3, 2010
Sean, Marcel Schwantes is a him. I know him well. And I am certain that if anyone intentionally removed the date of the resolution, which seems unlikely, it was done before it reached Marcel’s hands.
February 3, 2010
It’s nice to hear from Marcel, but we really need to hear from Erv. Marcel has made it clear that Erv personally asked to have the document posted.
Was Erv Taylor responsible for the missing date?
Erv has told me that he does not control the content of AToday. Marcel’s statement suggests otherwise.
Erv should bow out of any journalistic efforts on the evolution at LSU issue due to his extreme conflict of interest, since he himself has been a guest lecturer promoting evolutionary thought in at least one LSU classroom.
And Erv has provided plenty of evidence that he should no longer be permitted to be the publisher of a journal that uses the trademarked term “Adventist” as part of its name. But apparently the AToday board is controlled by individuals who are either sympathetic to or apathetic about Erv’s anti-Adventist and anti-Bible views.
February 3, 2010
Ah, sorry Marcel for the gender confusion (I once knew a girl named Marcel) – change comment to “I believe him!” ; )
February 4, 2010
After further reflection, I think what I wrote above is too pointed. My apologies for that.
Still, Marcel referred to AToday’s “efforts to reach the highest standards of journalistic excellence and integrity.” I do think that if “integrity” means “integrity,” and if “Adventist” in Adventist Today means “Adventist,” then that means that there will promptly be an overhaul of the AToday board and a change of publisher.
Otherwise, in Marcel’s comment, “integrity” doesn’t mean “integrity,” and “Adventist” doesn’t mean “Adventist.”
I also think that someone from AToday ought to make clear who removed the date in question. Apparently AToday is censoring that question over on their site, even though censorship is something they claim to be opposed to.
February 5, 2010
I take issue with shabby journalism, but at least they apologized. It still doesn’t excuse AToday’s obvious bias & agenda — that’s also shabby journalism. I also take issue with people calling themselves Adventist when they’re not. It’s sad that such theological liberals are in places people notice them, like at AToday. I’d say, “oh well, someday they’ll get their just reward” for promoting views against Biblical doctrine and the SDA church and just leave it at that, but these folks are taking hundreds of people with them. If you’re going to be lost, fine. But it’s a shame when a lost person is vocal about what they believe, dynamically dragging others to their spiritual death. Shame on Erv and AToday.
February 5, 2010
That came out kind of wrong. What I meant to say was that if you choose to be lost, that’s one thing, but to preach or teach theology not in accordance with the Bible, you will eventually lead others to destruction, as well as yourself. I didn’t intend to say anyone in specific was lost or not. Just that people “with no light in them” are dragging people down.
February 7, 2010
“The path of men who are placed as leaders is not an easy one. But they are to see in every difficulty a call to prayer. Never are they to fail of consulting the great Source of all wisdom. Strengthened and enlightened by the Master Worker, they will be enabled to stand firm against unholy influences and to discern right from wrong, good from evil. They will approve that which God approves, and will strive earnestly against the introduction of wrong principles into His cause.”–Prophets and Kings, p. 31.
“The greatest want of the world is the want of men,–men who will not be bought or sold; men who in their inmost souls are true and honest; men who do not fear to call sin by its right name; men whose conscience is as true to duty as the needle to the pole; men who will stand for the right though the heavens fall”.–Education, p. 57.
I applaud the decision of the board and the statement they gave out–but will this be followed by action? If so, when–and what kind of action will it be? And will other Adventist colleges or Universities also be included (by the folks in a position to do something there) before things reach this stage in them?
Where are the men (and women) in places of influence who are willing to call sin by it’s right name and cleanse the “camp” of that “abominable thing” before any more of our young people are led astray? (What secular company would tolerate one of it’s employs undermining it’s core beliefs–and all companies have certain guidelines their workers must embrace and promote–and still pay them a salary?) “Academic Freedom” cannot take president over “Academic Integrity!” If these teachers truly believe in evolution–which is certainly their privilege–they should go teach where it is accepted. It seems to me the height of outright dishonesty to come in and accept wages from the sacred tithe while trying to undermine one of the core beliefs of our church. Why do we tolerate this???
February 7, 2010
As we enter another week, many will be preparing to celebrate an historic event–the birthday of Charles Darwin. Set aside a little time to tip your hat on February 12th to the man who made this website possible.
February 15, 2010
@Bob Pickle:
Ok,ok, Bob, give a rest on the date thing !! Marcel applogised. What does it matter anymore ?? Maybe it came that way, who cares ? This isn’t the crux of the problem. Now your other charges-if you can proove them-should be looked into !
February 15, 2010
@Lydian Belknap:
AMEN !!
February 19, 2010
In my honest opinion it sounds more deliberate. I have lately been visiting their site and have found it very disturbing. They post articles that are unChrist-like and more of the world– like posting a movie review on AVATAR and a certain Pastor twisting the Bible’s point on the Roman Catholic Church and to doubt EGW writings and the Bible.
I’m sorry but the Adventist Today had not lived up to the SDA’s calling. Sad to say their main office is also found in LSU. If they really want to show that they stand by the SDA FB, they should not post stuff that insinuates doubt and promote worldly things. They tickle our senses but leads us further away from God– this is not what the Adventists need today. Why not focus on the Bible and how the prophecies are being fulfilled in an SDA’s life each day and not use the world’s pattern of journalism.
I thank this site for upholding the truth and fighting for what is right though the heaven’s fall. God bless Educate Truth and more power.
February 19, 2010
If they continue posting articles like Pastor Loren Seibold’s [Letting Roman Catholics Off the Hook]… they should as well drop their name. This article is also anti-SDA and insinuates doubt on EGW and Bible prophecies. Is that we call SDA journalism? The people behind Adventist Today is also responsible in posting these articles, they should know better. It shows that they don’t know where they stand and what principles govern them. Sorry but it makes me think there might be conspiracy behind all AToday has been doing for they misrepresent the SDA church. I hope they change their ways and not only to apologize –for the harm has been done.
February 19, 2010
It would appear that I haven’t raised the date question here since February 4. But I don’t think it should be given a rest.
AToday prides itself in being independent media, in not promoting a particular view or doctrine or agenda of the Adventist Church. But for AToday to engage in censorship of the simple question of how the date got deleted raises a lot of questions.
We’re talking about a document that Erv Taylor requested to be posted on AToday’s site, and any kind, simple question about the missing date gets censored from their site. They won’t allow the question to be posted. Why not, and who made that decision?
The fact that Marcel directs all further questions to Erv also seems to contradict Erv’s previous assertion that he as executive publisher does not control the content of AToday’s publications.
February 24, 2010
Thanks Ron. We are really in the end times. This has been predicted by EGW and thus it really shows the warning is actually from God. I’m glad the Bible is clear that we should not depend on our leaders for our faith but only on Jesus Christ. I’ll take note of these people and I hope they change when there is still time. Thanks, your posts have been very helpful. God bless!
February 24, 2010
I don’t care what their answer was – if it is true that even one pastor is promoting the abominations of Lev 18 regarding the gay agenda – that should result in an immediate attempt to help that pastor understand the basics of Bible exegesis — followed immediatly by the choice to either accept the Bible teaching on this subject or look into being a pastor for another denomination.
There was a time not 2 years past when I was telling a large group of non-SDAs that “NO denomination has fallen into the apostasy of endorsing the gay agenda without FIRST denying the authority of scripture and swallowing the lie of evolutionism” — and when I said that – I was typically making a favorable point about Christian denominations that did not go down that slippery slope.
in Christ,
Bob
Time for
February 25, 2010
Bob,
I have been working on the frontlines of ministry in a non-Adventist context for the last 18 years. I have worked with a myriad of Christian and non-Christian faiths during that time. I know all too well how the road to apostasy is paved with higher critical/theistic evolutionary intentions. I have debated many main-line church leaders on this very point. When I was in the M.Div program one of the sponsored seminarians I knew began to spout the pro-gay theology he had never shed from his non-Adventist undergrad experience. His sponsoring conference terminated his sponsorship (something I whole heartedly agreed with even though I liked the guy) and he went off to teach English in Korea.
I’m sorry Bob but I am compelled to hold us to a higher standard than ‘the end justifies the means.’ Quoting conference administrators as saying something they never said, exagerating their comments, saying they said something, when they never really said anything – is not excusable; no matter how culpable they may be. If we are going to hold them to a high standard then we must be willing to hold ourselves to one.
By the way, I’ve been over the list of endorsers on ‘a solemn appeal’ 3 or 4 times now and I can’t find a Tim Mitchell anywhere.
February 25, 2010
Popped back in to see where the discussion had got up to. Apparently it’s stuck on a loop of ‘Adventists who are not exactly like {me} are not Adventists at all and are bound for perdition’. It’s broadened out from creation/evolution to homosexuality and as broad as ‘liberal theology’ generally. I’m sure we’ll get to health care and liberal politics soon too: or is that already implicit? Hey “Educate Teabaggers!”
February 25, 2010
Agreed. My point was that actions speak louder than words — if those pastors are really in that level of apostasy – those administrators need to be doing a lot more than just talking.
in Christ,
Bob
February 25, 2010
I think that if you ignore enough of the substance and details in the issues being raised you could gloss it all over with a dismissive “sounds to me like people here are just complaining that someone is different from me”.
What kind of dark ages straying from the path could not happen under that kind of discernment??
Would there be any limit??
in Christ,
Bob
February 25, 2010
If I cared enough I’m sure I could copy and paste a dozen or more statements with that particular effect, though not in those words, of course. ‘Fraid I really, really don’t, though. If people can see it, they can see it in the existing posts where it is and don’t need me to point it out. If they can’t, pointing it out won’t help.
February 26, 2010
hmm another “I don’t actually have the data to support my latest accusation” post from Bravus??
How “unnexpected”.
February 26, 2010
Another complete failure to comprehend what the post actually said from Bob? Ditto!
February 28, 2010
Ron why are you so angry with Shane? You should be thanking the guy for allowing you to post here. He just wants you to be more congenial and there is nothing wrong with that. Name calling is not in good taste. We were all taught that when we were young.
March 2, 2010
Perhaps because this site is specifically focused on issues of origins, rather than on any and every complaint of those whose energy is focused on defending the church by attacking it?
March 2, 2010
Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition! Our three weapons are. . .
March 5, 2010
I do agree with Ron. Evolution is just at the tip of the iceberg. If we really want to have the truth and educate everyone… I hope you open a forum section which every issue could be tackled. [Just a suggestion]
March 8, 2010
Ron -
Your comment reminds me of something that I think applies to both cases equally -
March 8, 2010
Ron, why do you make so many vitriolic attacks against church leaders? Does love abide in your heart? It embarasses me that SDAs can be so nasty to each other in public venues.
March 8, 2010
Ron, I’m sorry–I didn’t realize that pointing out the faults of our leaders on publicly accessible websites was a Biblical belief. I realize our leaders vary in their commitment to upholding SDA biblical beliefs, but always believed it was better to take my concerns to the Lord on my knees in prayer than to try to convince everybody in a public venue that so-and-so and so-and-so and so-and-so are or aren’t doing such-and-such and such-and-such and such-and-such. But perhaps I’m mistaken–maybe I should try to dig up dirt on as many of our leaders, professors, physicians, etc., as I can–and let everybody know about it.