Insisting on a literal understading of Genesis 1 is both …

Comment on Adventists are virtually silent by Jag.

Insisting on a literal understading of Genesis 1 is both bad theology (Genesis 1 contradicts the second creation account in Genesis 2) and even worse science (we now knoe that both our planet and life on ot are billions of years old).

If the fundametalist elements in Adventism prevail, it will become another obscurantist cult.

Recent Comments by Jag

Private: Samuel Pipim comments on GC’s decisions regarding creation
Well, as usual – “doctor” Pipim stands for the truth the same way he stands for sexual morality.

If he were serious about his resignation he would withdraw his preaching, books and DVD’s. But somehow I suspect he is already planning a comeback.