Paul, do you have any empirical evidence that so-called evolutionary biology …

Comment on Believing the Disproven – An Adventure in Science by Gene Fortner.

paul,

do you have any empirical evidence that so-called evolutionary biology is anything but a pseudo science?

Gene Fortner Also Commented

Believing the Disproven – An Adventure in Science
I agree about conscience.

But, you didn’t answer the question.

WUWT?


Believing the Disproven – An Adventure in Science
Kirsten,

“I gather from Sean’s and Gene’s responses that science can be conveniently bypassed anytime”

Nope, you got it all wrong, we are not evolutionary biologists, Sean is a medical Doctor and I am a retired Sr. Staff Engineer / Scientist in Systems Engineering. We don’t make up “just so stories” to get grant $$$$.

Have another stab at the Law of Biogenesis.


Believing the Disproven – An Adventure in Science
George,

What do you base your morality on???

FYI

Richard Dawkins claims morality is evolved. Ravi Zacharias responds to that claim.
William Lane Craig also makes a valid argument, but he responds it a little differently. Watch the video here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nKkcZ9…

The difference is Dr. Craig argues from a purely logical point of view, Dr. Zacharias bring both heart and mind into it. Both make great points.

Apologetic Christians: William Lane Craig, John Lennox, Lee Strobel, Ravi Zacharias and More.

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL39PyMBMepLBg5WlcFRGC15iDpO-L5VcB


Recent Comments by Gene Fortner

GC Delegates Vote to Tighten Language of Fundamental #6 on Creation
yes


GC Delegates Vote to Tighten Language of Fundamental #6 on Creation
Bill “How inane would it be to claim an apple tree is not an apple tree unless and until it has apples on it?”

Bill,

Comparing babies and apple trees is a bit more inane than comparing apples and oranges.

BTW,

“The ONLY DEFINITION FOR SIN that we have in the Bible is that it is the transgression of the law… IT CONDEMNS EVERY SIN, AND REQUIRES EVERY VIRTUE.” E.G. White, ST, March 3, 1890 par. 3.

If it is a sin to possess a fallen nature then there must be a law against it. Has God given a law forbidding anyone from being conceived with a fallen human nature? If there ever was a law that was impossible to keep, this would be it, for how could one choose not to violate it before one existed?!


Summary of 60th General Conference Session (2015)
Thanks Sean


GC Delegates Vote to Tighten Language of Fundamental #6 on Creation
Ethan,

IMHO,

No statement was necessary.

In fact I consider it thoughtless.

FB#6 should have absolutely no effect on their ability to support the world church and perform work faithfully and with integrity.


GC Delegates Vote to Tighten Language of Fundamental #6 on Creation
@Bill Sorensen:

Bill,

Sin is transgression of the law.

Where does it say being born is a sin?