@pauluc: ODE TO PAULUC What ho! Who cometh down the …

Comment on Believing the Disproven – An Adventure in Science by wesley kime.

@pauluc:
ODE TO PAULUC

What ho! Who cometh down the hall,
Bearing gifts of frankincense, demur,
And empiric iambic pentameter,
Gut gestalt and extrapolated parameter;
Peddling virtual faith bereft of reason fer,
With widely opened yet blinkered eyes
And cultured mind wherewith to philosophize —
Who? Who but suddenly poetically polemic Paul?

My frail aging heart your poetry doth win over,
Like Schulz’s Lucy bowling over Shroeder.
When proof and reason simply can’t, will not go,
I’m subsumed by trope, synecdoche, and by rhyme.
Please, Ogden Nash not Kant or Edgar Allen Poe,
And buddy can you spare the paradigm?

If for faith you’ve forsaken Galileo for sure,
Kiss me quick you fool, I’m all yours,
My funny little provocateur.

Faith, O faith, trope and temerity,
These three, the greatest being disparity.

wesley kime Also Commented

Believing the Disproven – An Adventure in Science
@George: What is the accepted atheist interjection? You’re asking a blinkered old SDA? It is: OMG! Or OMG!!!!!!!! Or OMG :-} On twitter, #OMG.


Believing the Disproven – An Adventure in Science
@George:

So, do you honestly know your biblical god exists, or do you simply take the gestalt moment you felt under the klieg lights in the carnival tent at age 10 and circumscribe all your inquires therein? Take a good, hard look in the mirror Dr. Kime rather than just disparage those that have honest doubts about how religious belief comes about?

Honestly, Over the past half century since it’s become popular among Adventists too, and over the years on this blog, I’ve heard a lot of agnostics but never heard it put more crisply and nicely, with more postmodern whimsy (“uncertainties are my nuggets” or words to that effect), probably never more civilly, despite the part about “disparage.” Here we are, home, home on the range where seldom is heard a disparaging word. So you can’t be serious, can you? But seriously, it’s a privilege to be the one to whom is sung such a hymn to uncertainty, at whom such a gem, may I say nugget, is slung.

Now, putting down the mirror you handed me, smiling at your gift and at what I saw in it under the klieg lights (mainly jowls and sagging gestalt), may I submit that if there can be such things as “honest doubts,” exquisitely indubitably standardized and syllabized as they are, are there not also “honest certainties,” certainly of the Bible? You’ve got those, I’ve got these, and that’s that, undoubtedly, honestly, cordially. Eternally?
Yea-hee, pard! Lasso yourself a good undisparaged New Year, out here on the discouraging range!


Believing the Disproven – An Adventure in Science
@george:
Anent your comment unwittingly rhymed, I have a loose quatrain divined, to wit:
“Wit of Wes /No less,/ But an agnostic pest/ Doing my best/ I must remain.” It
Has more or less impelled me to board your rhyming train, to get:

Gentle ole George, grizzled George, he was a High Plains Drifter.
At home home on the discouraging range and purple prairie,
Hard panning for token gold among the tumbleweeds, suffering many a blister,
He merrily unearthed uncertainties many and airy, but nuggets nary.


Recent Comments by wesley kime

Dr. Walter Veith and the anti-vaccine arguments of Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche
Informative and stimulating, but proceeding into more confusion. A veteran of Moderna vaccinations, I trust, hope, they are effective, at least until otherwise. The whole business, being part of End Times, is in the hands of God, not humans expert and as degreed as they may be.


Brilliant and Beautiful, but Wrong
Brilliant, beautiful, and so right! Speaking of your presentation at LLU recently. Great to see you and your family (especially my namesake, Wes. God bless! WK


Complex Organisms are Degenerating – Rapidly
@Bob Helm: Dr. Sanford is very familiar to most of us. He was invited to speak at LLU several years ago and I and a great many were privileged to hear him.


Evolution from Space?
Hats off yet again to Sean for pursuing this topic as a scientist should, no nonsense, and in it’s proper setting — as a revival of one of the ancient ideas recently upgraded as a desperate alternative to the increasingly compelling intelligent design data. I had occasion to review panspermia a few years ago and as is my wont I found it more amusing than scientific. If you would like what was intended to be a satirical response to panspermia and other related curiosities you could check out: http://www.iessaythere.com/black-hole-humor.html
Meantime, Sean’s article is of far more cogent worth.


The Sabbath and the Covenants (Old vs. New)
As he has done on this site many times, Sean in his line-by-line-item response to C. White (not EG or EB) has, to my mind, clearly enunciated the issue and resolution.

When all the hermeneutics, quoting, and arguing and inordinately judgmental riposte are over, it comes down, as I understand it, to two things: 1) Whether the 7th day Sabbath (whether enunciated in the famous 10 commandments or otherwise) is still valid, and 2) Does the grace obtained by the vicarious sacrifice by the shedding of Christ’s blood or other divine process too deep for us to understand in this life, cover every sin automatically and without ado, altogether passively on our part, or is it only on condition that we first totally and deeply accept it? Other details always hassled forever are distractions.

I accept that I must accept it, wholly, actively, even with agony, with my whole being.