There is indeed plenty of information that effectively challenges the …

Comment on Transcript of Self-Recorded “LSU-4” Conversation Uploaded to the Riverside Superior Court Website by Sean Pitman.

There is indeed plenty of information that effectively challenges the basic tenets and claims of neo-Darwinism and that strongly supports the Biblical perspective on origins. Such information should at least be presented to students in our own schools by professors who actually believe in and support the Adventist position on origins.

Otherwise, our church is simply shooting itself in the foot. I personally wouldn’t send my own boys to any “Adventist” school that was actively undermining one of the key pillars of Adventism. I’d rather send them to a public university where at least everything that will be taught is open and transparent – without pretending that the school represents and supports something that it really doesn’t.

Sean Pitman
www.DetectingDesign.com

Recent Comments by Sean Pitman

After the Flood
Thank you Ariel. Hope you are doing well these days. Miss seeing you down at Loma Linda. Hope you had a Great Thanksgiving!


The Flood
Thank you Colin. Just trying to save lives any way I can. Not everything that the government does or leaders do is “evil” BTW…


The Flood
Only someone who knows the future can make such decisions without being a monster…


Pacific Union College Encouraging Homosexual Marriage?
Where did I “gloss over it”?


Review of “The Naked Emperor” by Pastor Conrad Vine
I fail to see where you have convincingly supported your claim that the GC leadership contributed to the harm of anyone’s personal religious liberties? – given that the GC leadership does not and could not override personal religious liberties in this country, nor substantively change the outcome of those who lost their jobs over various vaccine mandates. That’s just not how it works here in this country. Religious liberties are personally derived. Again, they simply are not based on a corporate or church position, but rely solely upon individual convictions – regardless of what the church may or may not say or do.

Yet, you say, “Who cares if it is written into law”? You should care. Everyone should care. It’s a very important law in this country. The idea that the organized church could have changed vaccine mandates simply isn’t true – particularly given the nature of certain types of jobs dealing with the most vulnerable in society (such as health care workers for example).

Beyond this, the GC Leadership did, in fact, write in support of personal religious convictions on this topic – and there are GC lawyers who have and continue to write personal letters in support of personal religious convictions (even if these personal convictions are at odds with the position of the church on a given topic). Just because the GC leadership also supports the advances of modern medicine doesn’t mean that the GC leadership cannot support individual convictions at the same time. Both are possible. This is not an inconsistency.