All this gratuitous hullabaloo about ID (the science, not the …

Comment on My Goal for La Sierra University by Wesley Kime.

All this gratuitous hullabaloo about ID (the science, not the Institute) not being science at all reminds me (as much a painter as pathologist) of how, in 1870, Impressionism was dismissed by the academics as hardly art at all, too undisciplined, too unrealistic, too parochial, too sloppy, too blobby. Disrespectful. Stupid. A sad waste of paint. And later, after Impressionism became the state religion like Christianity under Constantine, how John Singer Sargent’s painting was, if art, not FINE art, if art at all. Not creative, not loose enough, not unrealistic enough, not blobby. Mindlessly obsequious. A sad waste of talent. ID can’t be science, it’s too…whatever.

Wesley Kime Also Commented

My Goal for La Sierra University
This seems a pretty sleepy thread right now, so I’ll post an observation here while everybody is otherwise occupied.

Doctrinaire Evolutionists cringe and ram their fingers into their ears at any scientific talk of intelligent design. But, oh, the breathless rhapsodizing of the megaintelligence of Evolution and the extremely smart Evolutionary decisions on those pop-sci Evoramas on, say, the Science Channel! Makes your ears ring.


My Goal for La Sierra University
There has been a recent spate of encomiums for beloved LSU biology professors by LSU graduates, and, being one myself, a biology major, I want to join in.

Of all my professors, and I’ve had a slew of them, high school, college, medical school, my major professor was perhaps the most memorable. As admirable as any professor I ever had, including those at Harvard’s and Washington University’s graduate medical programs. My La Sierra major professor loved biology, taught it passionately with a burden to thoroughly teach and familiarize students with all data relating to all hypotheses, especially evolution (I’ll always remember that famous old embryology diagram demonstrating that “ontology begets phylogeny”). He stood in front of his class and he taught what he himself believed, ardently. He ardently and openly believed Genesis 1. Pity, for UCLA therefore granted Prof. Downs only an M.A. I am LSU (then LSC) class of 1948.

Now I spryly, as spryly as my aged joints allow, pop aside for the instant onslaught of posts decrying Bible College LSC’s embarrassing cultural, scientific, theological, biological, artistic, philosophical, sociological, mental, political, intellectual, hermeneutical ignorance — unrefined, unenlightened, primal, primeval, autistic … and so on. Excuse me while I take my nap. Carry on.


My Goal for La Sierra University
@Phillip Brantley: The Pith: “The interesting issue is how do we minister to those members in the Seventh-day Adventist Church who are ignorant ….”

WE? We minister? We being who? Who’s doing this ministering to the ignorant?

The lawyer corps? The scholar corps? The core lawyer? ….( might that be you?) The core scholar? Donald Trump? the FDA? TSA? The UN? In a pinch Al Gore or the pope or Fuller Seminary? But never one’s own self, one’s own mind, nor hardly (not even token) God, the Holy Spirit. Don’t even think about EGW.

And The Ignorant, who might they be? Easy. Ask the guy who does the ministering. Blessed are the ignorant for they…

Now then, as you were saying, and with such musical orotundity.


Recent Comments by Wesley Kime

Dr. Walter Veith and the anti-vaccine arguments of Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche
Informative and stimulating, but proceeding into more confusion. A veteran of Moderna vaccinations, I trust, hope, they are effective, at least until otherwise. The whole business, being part of End Times, is in the hands of God, not humans expert and as degreed as they may be.


Brilliant and Beautiful, but Wrong
Brilliant, beautiful, and so right! Speaking of your presentation at LLU recently. Great to see you and your family (especially my namesake, Wes. God bless! WK


Complex Organisms are Degenerating – Rapidly
@Bob Helm: Dr. Sanford is very familiar to most of us. He was invited to speak at LLU several years ago and I and a great many were privileged to hear him.


Evolution from Space?
Hats off yet again to Sean for pursuing this topic as a scientist should, no nonsense, and in it’s proper setting — as a revival of one of the ancient ideas recently upgraded as a desperate alternative to the increasingly compelling intelligent design data. I had occasion to review panspermia a few years ago and as is my wont I found it more amusing than scientific. If you would like what was intended to be a satirical response to panspermia and other related curiosities you could check out: http://www.iessaythere.com/black-hole-humor.html
Meantime, Sean’s article is of far more cogent worth.


The Sabbath and the Covenants (Old vs. New)
As he has done on this site many times, Sean in his line-by-line-item response to C. White (not EG or EB) has, to my mind, clearly enunciated the issue and resolution.

When all the hermeneutics, quoting, and arguing and inordinately judgmental riposte are over, it comes down, as I understand it, to two things: 1) Whether the 7th day Sabbath (whether enunciated in the famous 10 commandments or otherwise) is still valid, and 2) Does the grace obtained by the vicarious sacrifice by the shedding of Christ’s blood or other divine process too deep for us to understand in this life, cover every sin automatically and without ado, altogether passively on our part, or is it only on condition that we first totally and deeply accept it? Other details always hassled forever are distractions.

I accept that I must accept it, wholly, actively, even with agony, with my whole being.