David, I believe you are underestimating the gravity of the …

Comment on LSU Responds to Issues Regarding Dr. Diaz and WASC by Professor Kent.

David, I believe you are underestimating the gravity of the situation. I know you want to pin much of this on Randal Wisbey, who is a brilliant tactician and enginereed much of this after the fortuitous Louis Bishop incident. But the reality is that he could not orchestrate these things entirely on his own. He had to have help when as President of Columbia Union College he secretly arranged for the eventual withdrawal of accreditation at Atlantic Union College. He knew full well they were vulnerable and saw it as a great starting point to thwart Adventist education. Of course he jumped at the opportunity to become President at LSU, because he knew that their biologists and theologians could easily be manipulated to create public furor over evolutionist teaching. He was able to arrange the firing of five faculty over a few years time (McClosky, Bradley, Katz, Beach Greer), hoping that one of them (three as it turned out) would force a lawsuit and a confrontation with WASC. But he had to have help, of course, because he could not afford to be with the LSU “four” when they supposedly inadvertently recorded their forbidden talk of WASC accreditation. He knew full well that once WASC capitulated to his ruse, other regional accreditation agencies would see the value in WASC’s approach to wresting control of private universities from their church organizations. But again, he could not achieve all of this without the covert cooperation of other SDA leaders, almost surely including other SDA university presidents, at least one critical person at the GC whose name you can probably surmise, and probably one or two WASC officials whom he has possibly paid off. I’m guessing that Wisbey has already anticipated your efforts to block his plan, so he probably has an end-around in place. He is no doubt one step ahead of us, so let’s not settle too quickly on sensible explanations like the one you have proposed. We’re going to have to dig deeper and maintain suspicion of other influential parties as well. This is war, and we cannot allow this one mastermind to inflict irreparable harm to Adventist education. And we need to be alert to the possibility that a mastermind is manipulating Wisbey.

Professor Kent Also Commented

LSU Responds to Issues Regarding Dr. Diaz and WASC

Bill&#032Sorensen: You constantly “muddy” the waters by a lot of inane arguments when if you are “objective” you already know that LSU teaches evolution as a fact. Why don’t you simply [edit] admit it?

Bill, I seem to have gotten under your skin. I know for 100% fact that last school year LSU Biology gave a vigorous and supportive presentation of the SDA position of creation. If Sean Pitman knows as much as he claims he does, he is fully aware of this. Of course, he only wants you people to know one side of the story.


LSU Responds to Issues Regarding Dr. Diaz and WASC

Sean&#032Pitman: Why don’t you tell us? After all, I’ve spoken there a couple times myself. Again, this is irrelevant to the fact that LSU hires and maintains professors who believe and promote neo-Darwinism as the most plausible story of origins.

I’m reluctant to tell you because:

1) Your readers might think Professor Kent has a better grasp on the situation than you do. Moreover, they would be very disappointed in, or refuse to believe, any report that LSU upholds SDA beliefs.

2) You and your readers would mount an all-out campaign to discredit another fellow Christian.

And it’s disengenuous to say it is “irrelevant to the fact that LSU hires and maintains professors who believe and promote neo-Darwinism as the most plausible story of origins” if, in fact, LSU was teaching that neo-Darwinism has limitations and cannot be regarded as the most plausible story of origins.

Sorry, but I don’t believe you’re as well informed as you want your readers to believe, and I don’t think that truth really matters to you.


LSU Responds to Issues Regarding Dr. Diaz and WASC

Sean&#032Pitman: As far as someone else having a better grasp on what’s happening at LSU, that’s certainly possible since I’m not there. I live in N. Cal. after all and have to depend on what people who are there are telling me.

I appreciate your frank admission.

Do you believe that two people who see the same event, such as an automobile accident, often describe it in different terms? Have you ever heard a sermon in which two people thought the speaker was saying very different things?

In all seriousness, do you suppose those most likely to communicate things to you are those who are most likely to interpret statements by others the way you do? Or do you suppose the information you get is bias-free?


Recent Comments by Professor Kent

Gary Gilbert, Spectrum, and Pseudogenes
Nic&#032Samojluk: No wonder most creationist writers do not even try to submit their papers to such organizations.
Who wants to waste his/her time trying to enter through a door that is closed to him/her a priori?

You have no idea what you’re writing about, Nic. As it turns out, there are in fact many of us Adventists who “waste” our time publishing articles through doors that open to us a priori. Even Leonard Brand at Loma Linda, a widely recognized creationist, has published in the top geology journals. I mean the top journals in the discipline.

The myth that creationists cannot publish in mainstream science is perpetuated by people who simply do not understand the culture of science–and will remain clueless that they do not understand it even when confronted with their misunderstandings. Such is human nature.


Southern Adventist University opens Origins Exhibit
Pauluc,

Your questions about conservation genetics are very insightful. I don’t understand how all these life forms were able to greatly increase in genetic diversity while simultaneously winding down and losing genetic information to mutations. Sean seems to insist that both processes happen simultaneously. I had the impression he has insisted all along that the former cannot overcome the latter. But I think you must be right: God had to intervene to alter the course of nature. However, we can probably test this empirically because there must be a signature of evidence available in the DNA. I’ll bet Sean can find the evidence for this.

I’m also glad the predators (just 2 of most such species) in the ark had enough clean animals (14 of each such species) to eat during the deluge and in the months and years after they emerged from the ark that they didn’t wipe out the vast majority of animal species through predation. Maybe they all consumed manna while in the ark and during the first few months or years afterward. Perhaps Sean can find in the literature a gene for a single digestive enzyme that is common to all predatory animals, from the lowest invertebrate to the highest vertebrate. Now that would be amazing.

Wait a minute–I remember once being told that SDA biologists like Art Chadwick believe that some animals survived on floating vegetation outside the ark. Now that would solve some of these very real problems! I wonder whether readers here would allow for this possibility. Multiple arks without walls, roof, and human caretakers.


Southern Adventist University opens Origins Exhibit

Ellen White said, “In the days of Noah, men…many times larger than now exist, were buried, and thus preserved as an evidence to later generations that the antediluvians [presumably referring to humans] perished by a flood. God designed that the discovery of these things should establish faith in inspired history…”

Sean Pitman said, “All human fossils discovered so far are Tertiary or post-Flood fossils. There are no known antediluvian human fossils.”

Ellen White tells us that humans and dinosaurs (presumably referred to in the statement, “a class of very large animals which perished at the flood… mammoth animals”) lived together before the flood. Evolutionary biologists tell us that dinosaurs and humans never lived together. You’re telling us, Sean, that the fossil record supports the conclusion of evolutionists rather than that of Ellen White and the SDA Church. Many of the “very large animals which perished at the flood” are found only in fossil deposits prior to or attributed to the flood, whereas hunans occur in fossil deposits only after the flood (when their numbers were most scarce).

Should the SDA biologists, who are supposed to teach “creation science,” be fired if they teach what you have just conceded?


La Sierra Univeristy Fires Dr. Lee Greer; Signs anti-Creation Bond
For those aghast about the LSU situation and wondering what other SDA institutions have taken out bonds, hold on to your britches. You’ll be stunned when you learn (soon) how many of our other schools, and which ones in particular, have taken out these bonds. You will be amazed to learn just how many other administrators have deliberately secularized their institutions besides Randal Wisbey, presumably because they too hate the SDA Church (as David Read has put it so tactfully).

Be sure to protest equally loudly.


Gary Gilbert, Spectrum, and Pseudogenes
@Sean Pitman:

So clearly you believe that science can explain supernatural events. Congratulations on that.