Comment on LSU resignations discussed by Faith and Science Sabbath School by Jonathan K.
I agree with Dr. Giem in general except where he acknowledges he goes into “conjecture” mode, but his conclusion comes across too vague. What exactly is it that needs to be done besides what La Sierra has already done both pre-resignations and during the resignations?
Also why ignore the contents of the town hall meeting? Is that not evidence that leadership is talking out of both sides of their mouth to their constituency? I guess we’ll see where things go from here.
