Sean Pitman M.D.: Also, you assume that the mainstream ideas …

Comment on La Sierra “outraged” over Educate Truth article by Mark Houston.

Sean Pitman M.D.: Also, you assume that the mainstream ideas for the age of the Ice Man is correct. Given that these assumptions are based on radiometric dating, radiocarbon in particular, they should be taken with just a little grain of salt. Also, I don’t see any problem with the start of pyramid building or early civilization during this time. This is all consistent with the biblical narrative…

…Sean, thanks for your answer(s)? (And Shane, thanks for allowing me to continue asking questions right here). I’m not arguing as an evolutionist here. One can doubt details of the theory of evolution without being a creationist and vice-versa.
Anyway: Until some days ago I thought the catastrophic cooling was assumed to have happened directly after the flood – I probably got that wrong.

Now it should have happened some centuries after the flood, maybe due to a gigantic volcanic eruption (did that leave massive amounts of ash or other traces? are there historical references, maybe in cuneiform or hieroglyphs ?)
…And did e.g. penguins and antarctic fish evolve their marvelous ways of coping with extreme cold after this event? (Sorry, I wanted to confine this to mammoths alone).

I’m really looking forward to a comprehensive natural history that contradicts neither obvious facts nor common sense nor the biblical account taken literally.

Mark

Mark Houston Also Commented

La Sierra “outraged” over Educate Truth article
@Sean Pitman: My last questions seemed too far off topic (and too many at once), so I sent them in a private email. Nonetheless I again want express my gratitude for the many detailed answers!
Just one additional note: Relativity has at most one “logical problem”, which is not really a problem but simply something contradicting our everyday experience:
Velocities don’t exactly add up and the sum of two velocities can never exceed the speed of light in vacuum. This has been experimentally verified countless times. The rest is pure logic, even the famous twin-paradox.

@Bravus: I’m 6 feet tall. My double-sized twin
would be 12 feet tall (no surprise there), 4 times stronger, because strength scales with length scale squared, since it essentially depends on the muscles’ cross sectional area, *but* 8(!) times heavier (since body mass scales with length scale cubed). So though vastly stronger than me, my big twin brother would be a weakling measured by his ratio of strength to body mass. He would also need 8 times more food and break his bones much more easily.
The only way out would be a totally different body plan or some trick like Kevlar bones.
An elephant sized mouse would most probably be crushed by it’s own weight. By the same token, “super strong” insects are no wonder of nature. Their enormous strength (compared to their body mass) is just in accordance with the twin story above. Nothing more.
So, until proven wrong by a well documented 12 foot human skeleton (not photoshopped “photographs” from the internet) I won’t believe in the existence of (viable and healthy) human beings twice my size.
I was just curious because time and again I heard stories of ancient/antediluvian giants (which strongly interested me long before I grasped scaling-laws).

Thanks for all the answers!
Mark


La Sierra “outraged” over Educate Truth article
@Sean Pitman M.D.: Sean, thanks, I respect your efforts to answer my questions (in stark contrast to other YEC supporters who react to plain questions with ad hominem attacks)! Thanks also for admitting that (at least for once), you don’t know, too :-).

Mark


La Sierra “outraged” over Educate Truth article

Sean Pitman M.D.: Yes. Birds can rapidly loose their ability to fly as cavefish can rapidly loose their ability to grow eyes – with just one point mutation in fact. Loosing something is much easier than evolving something brand new that never was present within the gene pool of ancestral options.

…I’m really grateful for your readiness to give answers! Though this Q&A session is threatening to grow out of bounds there’s (at least) one more thing: It’s not about penguins losing the ability to fly. It is rather about gaining the ability to swim (very) well (that could have been present before the flood), mechanisms to cope with extreme cold as an individual (some tricks with the blood circuit) and as a group (presumably hard-wired behavioral patterns allowing penguins not to freeze to death by warming each other).

best,
Mark


Recent Comments by Mark Houston

What is taught at LSU
@Kevin:
Excuse me, but have you studied the full extent of Walter Veith’s “lectures”? He is an embarrassment (my favorite lecture unearths a conspiracy somehow connected to the “fact” that every American president since Abe Lincoln or so is the descendant from some royal European bloodline). Why does his name turn up here again and again?

Mark


Why Orthodox Darwinism Demands Atheism
I hope you realize that camels are perfectly adapted (or created- doesn’t matter) to a post fall (are probably post flood) environment.

Mark


Silence of the Geoscience Research Institute
@BobRyan:

The strong nuclear force is the one you see released during a fusion reaction.

…No no no – ouch! The strong nuclear force is *not* “released” during a fusion reaction (or at any other time) – this quote is a clear demonstration of a significant lack of physical knowledge (to put it in friendly terms).

Mark


Silence of the Geoscience Research Institute
@David: If you call the strong nuclear force “god” it would only be fair to give that name to electromagnetism, gravity and the weak nuclear force, too. But, whichever naming scheme you choose, this seems a bit pantheistic.

Mark


EducateTruth.com promoted on 3ABN
A sudden extreme cold snap is not necessarily related with a cold period causing glaciers to extend down south to Illinois. If all frozen mammoths really died quite exactly at the same time, they all should give the same age when dated with whatever method available. Even if the absolute age was off, the same “radiometric” age for all the mammoths we’re talking about would support your theory.

Mark