@Wendell & Ken: If the two of you would like …

Comment on The Rise of Theistic Evolutionism – The Salvation of Christianity? by Admin.

@Wendell & Ken: If the two of you would like to continue your discussion amongst yourselves via email, we offer to act as intermediary for your email exchange. We allow for a lot of latitude in the topics here at Educate Truth as long as they pertain to the topics that are addressed here.

However, this isn’t the place for long comments and conversations about Bible prophecy etc. Let us know know if you’d like to exchange emails. -Educate Truth Admin

Admin Also Commented

The Rise of Theistic Evolutionism – The Salvation of Christianity?

Professor&#32Kent: And yet millions of Christians who accept theistic evolution (erroneously, in my opinion) continue to vibrantly witness for the Lord, our Savior.

Not in regard to creation, but I have no doubt God can use them to witness on points of truth they do have.


Recent Comments by Admin

Private Recorded Conversation Prompts La Sierra Resignations

Ron&#32Stone&#32M&#46D&#46: then he “accidentally” recorded the private meeting, right?

That’s exactly right. He must have not bothered to play it back. I think the meeting was a couple hours according to the LSU news release. But basically he didn’t know he had recorded him and the others and then posted it without checking his recording.


The ANN Highlights LSU’s Dr. Lee Grismer – An Evolutionary Biologist

Eddie: Doesn’t LSU’s administration deserve at least a little bit of credit?

I think so. There are some very dedicated individuals on the board.I have no doubt they’re doing everything they can to address this issue.


Blasphemy of a Different Kind
@Ron Stone M.D.: I agree. LSU has not been a shining light for our church. That’s unfortunate. That might be the case for other schools as well.


Former board member never talked with biology faculty
@Alexander Carpenter: I would readily agree since Educate Truth supports the biblical account of creation and disagrees with the handling of the topic in the biology department. This was a political move by Wisbey to gain power on the board. He now has three less who oppose him.


Former board member never talked with biology faculty
@David Read: Board members and even former board members are not allowed to discuss what has happened in board meetings. The only thing I confirmed with Tooma was whether she had conversed with the biology faculty and she made it very clear she never had. She was only presented with the joint statement and wanted to support it. This statement was seen as a big step for the biology department because Wisbey had been keeping them silent for over two years and they were now making constructive advances to dialogue with the church. I disagree with what they said, but I think it’s great their talking now. I suspect Wisbey isn’t happy with the biology department. It wouldn’t make any sense for him to only be upset with the board members since he allegedly embraces what they are doing. Doubtful though given his reaction and double standard.